Showing posts with label torture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label torture. Show all posts

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Holding a mirror to the US - on exceptionalism, double standards & global police supra-state

A great opinion piece on American actions all around the world, all the while, boasting of its moral superiority over others. That moral superiority, which US achieves through its military might & forcing others (notably Europe) to follow, has gained US & its citizens more of hateful scorns from around the world than grateful praises.

The so-called "independent" media & journalism all over the world follows the US command of showing the Western Europe, Australia, & North America (US & Canada only) as the beacon of hope, honesty, fairness, law & order, & freedom & independence. That same "independent" media also shows how their own countries are worthless pieces of lands where anarchy & chaos apparently rules & people have nothing else to do but fight each other. As I have said multiple times before in my blog posts that Global North's polished image is like the Snow White's poisoned polished apple.

As the Chancellor correctly points out in movie, "V for Vendetta," that fear is the best way to control populations, American politicians have resorted to the same tactic. Donald Trump isn't the first one resorting to lies & false news stories to increase divisiveness & fear, & rile up its followers. Every American President from Second World War onwards has done the exact same thing; Germans, Japanese, Vietnamese, Cubans, Russians, Muslims have already been targeted, or are being targeted, & the Chinese are the next in the American & its European crosshairs.

As an aside, I love the Star Trek series; "Star Trek: The Next Generation". I always wonder while watching this TV series that if American & European politicians learn how to lead & govern from this TV series, the world would become a far better place by itself.

The right to lead can never be earned through military might & covert backroom agendas but by leading by example. America wants to be considered exceptional because it thinks it has those noble qualities of honesty, fairness, hope, justice etc., & hence, it thinks it has the right to lead the world towards a better place, but then it institutes double standards & injustices to put in place policies (sanctions, wars etc.) to control people & information, even at the expense of innocent lives. In some respect, what is going on in US right now; the violence being borne out of racial fears among its own American citizens, is a direct result of its actions on other nations, countries, & people around the world.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


As the Middle East continues to descend into madness, wrecked by wars & convulsed by human tragedies, America stands at the center of it all - the grand engineer of instability, the architect of a world system which cornerstone is profoundly ademocratic.

For well over a decade now the world has been force-fed American exceptionalism; taught to believe that America knows best what the world needs, how it needs to be organized & more importantly under whose leadership countries should be allowed to function.

Any challenge to Washington's authority & its supra-national moral legitimacy have systematically been met by furious media slander & threats of sanctions - Russia, more than any other country knows what it cost to stand up to this new American political deity.

The self-appointed political world police, the US has run, dominated & of course dictated the world's media narrative, playing democratic mind games with a gullible public while pursuing violent covert agendas. The Middle East of course has stood at the epicenter of this grand play for regime change & race for control.

If you thought America' s military interventions in Afghanistan & Iraq in the wake of 9/11 only exacerbated tensions, adding more fire to the predetermined narrative of perpetual war, then what of the destruction which has rained on Libya, Syria & now Yemen? Where exactly will the drones & tanks stop? How many communities will have to be laid waste before this prodigal democratic era US politicians have so fervently talked about actually manifests itself?

We have gone so far down the rabbit hole that people have become desensitized to human rights violations, breaches in privacy laws & blatant disregard for international law, all in the name of evasive national security.

With US politicians running the rationale of fear on all platforms available, reason & logic have been labeled under temporary insanity & conspiracy. According to Washington, the world needs direction - the type of righteous direction only America can give since its very constitution stands the perfect expression of all things fiercely democratic & freedom perfect. In this Orwellian play we find ourselves stuck in, all countries have been made-to-measure to Washington's political standards & expectations. Democratic devolution you say?

I would argue this train has already left the station. We have now entered the uncharted territories of a US-run supra-national police state system, where globalism rhymes with authoritarianism. A brave new world indeed.

So Arab leaders are dictatorial & despicably abusive toward their own people, or so the US says. Well in most cases that's true enough, but that never stopped the US or other Western capitals for that matter to develop close economic & political ties with them. Funny how dutiful America only woke up to the horrors of Arab fascism when nations began clamoring for independence.

From Muammar Gaddafi to Saddam Hussein & the Shah of Iran, Washington's friends & allies have not exactly been choir boys - more the who's who of the world most violent tyrants.

But that's not even the point. The point is, when a country decides to drop names & list offenses it better make sure that its own government is not committing the very crimes it finds so revolting in others.

US officials today have justified their intervention in Syria by arguing terror militants need to be dealt with as a matter of urgency to protect Western democracies. Those same officials have, in the same breath, argued that "moderate" radicals should be used to depose Syrian President Bashar Al Assad as the latter no longer holds popular legitimacy. The rationale here is that a democratically elected head of state should be actively brought down by way of terrorism to help promote stability. I have to say, I'm confused here.

More confusing still, in recent weeks Russia was slammed for allegedly planning to actively oppose ISIS militants in Syria. You would think that Western powers would actually hail counter-terrorism efforts. Wrong! As far as Washington is concerned only it can wield military force to oppose terror - anyone else's efforts are illegal.

Commenting on the matter on September 10, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stressed, “As we are facing unfounded accusations that we are doing something illegal and reinforcing the ISIL, I'd recommend watching the coalition's actions.” He added, "I am convinced that coordinated efforts are quite possible if double standards are rejected."

And indeed, double standards stand at the core of all the world's problems.

For example, when asked why President Assad lost all legitimacy officials & analysts have intermittently advanced that his rule was forfeited the second he began targeting his own people for political advancement. The same rhetoric has held for Libya, Yemen, Iraq & everything in between.

Since 9/11 America has moved in a higher plane of morality, on account of its political, economic & military might.

But let's turn the mirror around for a second & see what reflects back.

Wasn't it America which gifted the world with such things as renditions, institutionalized surveillance, black sites, systematic tortures, ethno-religious profiling & other niceties?

Wasn't it America again which opened an illegal black hole when its leaders decided that unmanned drones should enter the military fray as murdering weapons of choice?

America has no lesson to give when it comes to democracy building & legitimacy … & it certainly cannot claim to any form of exceptionalism; not when it has so much blood on its hands & not when it has committed so very few funds to humanitarian aid.

If anything Washington officials have mastered the art of terror-propping & radical-funding - from Ukraine to Syria, America has some of the world most despicable characters on its payroll … All for the greater good of course.

 
Catherine Shakdam is a political analyst, writer and commentator for the Middle East with a special focus on radical movements and Yemen. A regular pundit on RT and other networks her work has appeared in major publications: MintPress, the Foreign Policy Journal, Mehr News and many others. Director of Programs at the Shafaqna Institute for Middle Eastern Studies, Catherine is also the co-founder of Veritas Consulting. She is the author of Arabia’s Rising - Under The Banner Of The First Imam

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Ex-CIA executive director admits waterboarding is ‘torture’

Since, there's so much written about torture / "enhanced interrogation" techniques at Guantanamo Bay, there's nothing much left to comment on it. However, I would like to point out one thing this article mentions about these "enhanced interrogation" techniques.

As the article mentions that some of these torture techniques have been borrowed from the "torture book" of Nazi Germany.

So, it's all good & ok to vilify Nazis and describe Adolf Hitler as the most despicable human who ever lived, but it's all good and ok to copy the torture tactics from Nazis & apply them extensively on people who are still waiting for the lawful punishments for their alleged crimes.

Think of it like this; you hate that coworker at your workplace who bullies everyone & everyone is afraid of him/her. Would you, a nice person, copy & act like that bully & still think that you are not only a nice person, but people are respecting you because you are still being a considered a nice person by others?

Or what if your husband or boyfriend start copying tactics & methods of a rapist? Would you still think that he is a nice person with whom you are or willing to have a family?

Furthermore, perhaps, Nazis were using these "enhanced interrogation" techniques to extract info from Jews. They wanted to eliminate all Jews from lands they had occupied. Perhaps, they labelled "Jews" as "terrorists" & considered themselves & their nations / occupied lands to be threatened by Jews, & hence, wanted to extract info from captured Jews in any way they can, so they can exterminate all of them. Now, what if, we replace "Nazis" with "American military" & "Jews" with "Muslims". Lo and behold, we got Gitmo !!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The most senior CIA officer on record yet has said he’s “comfortable with saying” that waterboarding & related interrogation methods were “torture.” He was commenting on the post-9/11 “enhanced interrogation” tactics used by the Bush Administration.

The remarks by former executive director of the CIA, Alvin ‘Buzzy’ Krongard (2001-2004), were made to BBC’s Panorama. The third most senior former official at the agency was asked if he thought waterboarding & related tools amounted to torture.

Well, let's put it this way, it is meant to make him (the suspect) as uncomfortable as possible. So I assume, without getting into semantics, that's torture. I'm comfortable with saying that."

The torture debate has never let up. President Barack Obama famously put an end to torture in 2009, but failed to prosecute senior Bush-era officials for running such programs.

In the past, the position of all Bush-era officials was overwhelmingly that the euphemistically-called “enhanced interrogation” is not torture, as it was approved by the White House at the time. Those techniques included, aside from waterboarding, sleep deprivation, forcing detainees into uncomfortable physical positions, slamming them into flexible walls, as well as cramming them into small spaces, beating them physically & subjecting them to ice-cold baths.

Guantanamo Bay, which Obama has several times promised to shut down, is still operating. Panorama writes how one detainee, Abu Zubayadh, accused of being a key Al-Qaeda recruiter, has been in detention there since 2002. During these 14 years, he has regularly been stuffed into a box barely larger than a square meter, sometimes for 29 hours at a time. The person is forced to sit in a crouched position, with no room to breathe or do anything else.

Another, upright, coffin-shaped box was also used. Abu spent more than 11 days confined in that.

All the methods were taken from the CIA’s SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance & Escape) handbook on resisting interrogation. Some of the torture methods date back to Nazi Germany.

SERE military instructor Malcolm Nance talked to Panorama, explaining how “these close confinement boxes were used by the SS… They would stuff these British and American agents into them and drive them mad.”

The practice was banned by the Geneva Conventions, but this ban didn’t prevent its use on Guantanamo Bay inmates.

A host of other methods thought to have been banned were uncovered in last December’s Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report, which dealt with the interrogation of terror suspects in secret CIA prison facilities.

According to Krongard, any intelligence extracted that the Brits found interesting & “particularly represented a threat” was shared with them by the Americans. "I can't think of two intelligence services working in a more harmonious or closer [way] and that I think, had a lot to do with the relationship at the top," he added.

When asked if he thought the British knew or approved of the interrogation methods, Krongard said: “It’s hard for me to think that they didn’t, they’re professional intelligence people, I mean obviously.”

However, when the BBC approached the Foreign Office to ask whether accepting information gathered through torture was fine, it received an adamant reply: “We do not condone it, nor do we ask others to do it on our behalf."

The results of the Senate Intelligence Committee probe were published last December. Though much of the report was redacted, it contained shocking findings about what was euphemistically called “enhanced interrogation techniques,” including the admission that they were ultimately ineffective.

Friday, July 10, 2015

Study accuses psychologists group of complicity in CIA torture program

It's funny how there was no noise in the media about this that how a major scientific organization, in fact, the largest professional scientific organization of its kind, collaborated with the US government in its torturous treatment of Guantanamo detainees.

It's funny how we rationalize even if we are doing something wrong. The whole group of psychologists apparently rationalized that those detainees are sub-humans, or not humans at all, & hence, torturing them is justified. Even though, that torture is not getting any results at all.

What happened to the organization's ethics?

What happened to the psychologists' morals?

What happened to the psychologists' ability to ask questions themselves that what are we doing?

What happened to psychologists' Hippocratic oaths to not harm fellow human beings, for apparently, no good reason?

Last, but not least, what happened to this news in showing up in major North American news outlets & media? If North America is such a paragon of democracy & free speech around the world, then why wasn't it got reported by major news outlets in North America?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The American Psychologists Association, the largest professional scientific organization of its kind, was secretly complicit in the adoption of torturous interrogation tactics used by the US against detainees, a new report suggests.
 
A study released this week by noteable anti-torture critics reveals that an analysis of emails from the inbox of a deceased US government contractor demonstrates compliance on behalf of the APA with regards to the drafting of so-called enhanced interrogation techniques, or EITs, developed under President George W. Bush.
 
APA officials was in cahoots with members of the Bush administration, including CIA employees & contractors, when the government struggled to codify policies for its torture program following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to the report – an effort led by psychoanalyst & anti-war activist Stephen Soldz as well as Nathaniel Raymond & Steven Reisner – two members of the group Physicians for Human Rights.

The APA secretly coordinated with officials from the CIA, White House & the Department of Defense to create an APA ethics policy on national security interrogations which comported with then-classified legal guidance authorizing the CIA torture program,” the authors say.

The complicity between APA & government entities appears to have directly influenced the APA ethics policy changes, codified into the June 2005 report of the APA’s Presidential Task Force on Psychological Ethics & National Security (PENS),” continues their report, aptly named “All the President’s Psychologists.”

Contrary to previous claims made by the world's largest association of psychologists, the study suggests that the APA was intimately aware of the torture program but did nothing to discourage its development. Further, its authors also allege that the behavior science advisor to Pres. Bush is reported to have drafted “language related to research” that the APA inserted into its official ethics policy on interrogations published in 2005 at the height of the US-led war on terror, & that the organization failed to disclose ties with doctors linked to the EIT program.
 
The PENS report, the authors behind the latest study say, permitted psychologists to monitor & evaluate the safety & efficacy of the “enhanced” interrogation program, albeit after direct collusion with the Bush administration.
 
Nearly 700 emails from the late Scott Gerwehr – a researcher for RAND Corporation & an “apparent CIA contractor,” the study says – show the APA had numerous contacts with Drs. James Mitchell & Bruce Jessen, the alleged architects of the torture program, beginning in at least 2003. Nevertheless, the APA has distanced itself from any affiliation with either, according to the study.
 
With more than 137,000 members, the authors of All the President’s Psychologists say the APA’s past actions, according to this week’s report, “undermines the fundamental ethical standards of the profession.”
 
The analysis presented in this report raises serious concerns about the APA Board’s knowledge of, involvement in, & responsibility for allowing the US government to unduly influence & change APA policy on interrogations,” the authors say.

The resulting policy facilitated the continuation of the Bush Administration torture program. Additionally, the Board’s rapid codification of the PENS report’s conclusions into APA policy was accompanied by a litany of obscurantist public statements issued by APA presidents, Boards, & the press office. These statements did not accurately portray the history of the APA’s connection with individuals & government entities involved in the ‘enhanced’ interrogation program.”

Rhea Farberman, a spokeswoman for APA, told the New York Times that there “has never been any coordination between APA & the Bush administration on how APA responded to the controversies about the role of psychologists in the interrogations program.”

Last year, the results of a long-awaited “torture report” penned by member of the US Senate on the use of EITs was published despite efforts from the CIA to stifle publication. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California), the chair of the committee that conducted the four-year investigation, said there was “no evidence that terror attacks were stopped, terrorists captured or lives saved through use of EITs.”

Saturday, June 6, 2015

Criminal Minds, S1E8 (quote 2)

A great quote from Carl Jung. People who have internal issues (abused in the past, mentally unhealthy etc.) are more inclined to hurt others than, rather, mentally healthy people. Some of the examples are US soldiers keeping guard in Gitmo prison (there are narratives from soldiers who couldn't torture those detainees because they were apparently mentally healthy, but some really enjoy it). Then, there is a certain occupying force in the Middle East (i.e. Holy Land), who were tortured (at least, their predecessors) in Europe.

 

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Pentagon blocks UN torture investigator from meeting Gitmo detainees

Isn't it ironic that Transparency International rates governments & their governance on how transparent & free of corruption they are? But when it comes to Western countries, although Transparency International says that these are the least corrupt / most transparent governments, it seems they hide more than they reveal. Several critical matters of the government are hidden from their own public (that's why, Snowden's & Manning's & several other whistleblowers' revelations were surprising).

If prisoners are being treated so fairly & are well-maintained in Gitmo, then why hide under the guise of national security?

After all, it's not like these lawyers are related to terrorism in any way or will try to harm Americans in any way. They just want full & impartial access to the detainees. They are not even asking for these detainees' release or anything of that sort. If you are trying to hide something, then something is not right.

When Iran didn't allow IAEA (a UN agency) inspectors to completely inspect its nuclear facilities, the whole Western world was up in arms about it & slapped sanctions on Iran. Transparency International rated Iran as a corrupt regime. When US doesn't allow UN inspectors to visit Guantanamo prison, the whole Western world is silent as if there's nothing wrong with it. Transparency International still rates US as a transparent & open country. Something smells of hypocrisy here.

A common piece of advice parents give to their kids that if you are doing something & you don't know whether you should do it or not, then think about it this way that would I tell my parent(s) what I did. We, as parents, unabashedly tell our kids to always tell the truth, & not hide anything from their elders, regardless how horrible the situation, but, then we turn around, lie & hide to our heart's content.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




The Pentagon said it will refuse the United Nations special rapporteur on torture from interviewing or even meeting detainees held at the US military prison at Guantanamo Bay. The UN’s Juan E. Mendez called for increased access to the prison ... .

The Guardian reported ... that the Obama administration had reaffirmed its commitment to secrecy at the notorious detention center following a visit to Gitmo by a handful of new US senators who are supportive of the prison.

Méndez, the UN’s special rapporteur on torture, “has been invited to visit Guantánamo; however, he will not be permitted to interview detainees,” Army Lieutenant Colonel Myles Caggins, a Pentagon spokesman, told the Guardian.

... Méndez said he has been offered certain terms attached to a Gitmo visit, yet he, like his predecessor in 2004, declined to accept based on stipulations he deemed too narrow.

"The invitation is to get a briefing from the authorities and to visit some parts of the prison, but not all, and specifically I am not allowed to have unmonitored or even monitored conversations with any inmate in Guantanamo Bay," he said.

Mendez has sought a level of unfettered access to Gitmo detainees since 2010, yet the Obama administration continues to spurn his requests, maintaining that Mendez is allowed only a restricted viewing of the prison facilities.

Méndez has called indefinite detention -- the hallmark quality of the Guantanamo prison -- “itself a form of cruel, inhuman & degrading treatment.” His office has said forced feedings used by Guantanamo officials to break prisoner hunger strikes “in some cases can amount to torture.”

Around 122 detainees remain locked away at Gitmo, far from the public eye, as the majority of them have been held at the facility without trial or charge.

Guantanamo continues to be widely criticized for its inhuman housing conditions & questionable interrogation methods – among them force-feeding, regarded by many as torture, the fact that lawyers can’t gain access to their clients, & the fact that the majority of prisoners still haven’t been charged.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is allowed detainee visits, among other access at Guantanamo. But, in order to maintain its privileges, ICRC does not publicly divulge details of its visits to prisons.

The ongoing refusal of detainee access for a top UN human rights official was on par with the Obama administration’s “continued policy of secrecy” surrounding the detention center, said Laura Pitter of Human Rights Watch.

Yes, the US gives the ICRC access but that access is subject to strict confidentiality. If the US is truly treating detainees humanely at Guantánamo & it [is] proud of the detention conditions there, why not open the facility up for inspection by the UN special rapporteur, who has access to other prisons all over the world,” Pitter said.

Cori Crider, a lawyer for the human rights group Reprieve, told the Guardian her organization stands behind Méndez for refusing to take a “Potemkin Village tour” of Guantanamo.

Barring the UN’s torture expert from talking to prisoners is just the Pentagon’s latest effort to keep a tight lid on the grim realities of life at Gitmo: the desperation, the pain of force-feeding, the abuse,” Crider said.

If the Obama administration is really committed to transparency, it ought to put up or shut up, let respected UN experts interview detainees, & release the force-feeding tapes,” Crider said.

Crider added: “The reason they won’t let Mr Méndez interview detainees is the same reason that the administration is fighting to suppress the videotapes of my client Abu Wa’el Dhiab being strapped into a restraint chair & force-fed – the authorities don’t want Americans to see the stomach-turning truth about Guantanamo today.”

5 newly elected US senators visited Guantanamo over the weekend. The senators – all supportive of the continued existence of what has become an international symbol of human rights abuses -- included Tom Cotton, of Arkansas.

"In my opinion, the only problem with Guantanamo Bay is there are too many empty beds & cells there right now," Cotton said of Gitmo during a Senate hearing in February.

"We should be sending more terrorists there for further interrogation to keep this country safe. As far as I'm concerned, every last one of them can rot in hell. But as long as they can't do that, they can rot in Guantanamo Bay."

The majority of detainees remaining at Gitmo have been cleared for release, but remain there due to political or diplomatic obstacles in repatriating them.

Approximately another 30 or so prisoners have been designated for continued detention without trial. These are men considered by the US as too dangerous to release, yet against whom the government lacks usable evidence for a conviction.

Friday, April 3, 2015

Court presses US gov't to release 2,100 Guantanamo photos

When gov't comes out with a law to invade civilians' privacy, some people say, "you should not worry if you have nothing to hide." Then, the question arises, doesn't the same statement apply to the gov't? US gov't should not worry, if it has nothing to hide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A federal court insists it wants the Department of Defense to supplement the 2,100 pictures showing US military abuse of detainees in Iraq & Afghanistan with an individual reason for not making each of them public.

 
Judge Alvin Hellerstein gave a week to the government on Wednesday either to submit a written estimate of how long it might take to comply with the August 2014 ruling & list individual exemptions for the disclosure of the photographs, or to appeal the court’s decision.
 
The photographs in question depict abuse at US detention facilities in Iraq & Afghanistan following 9/11 attacks. They are believed to be more disturbing than the notorious images of torture & humiliation of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison.
 
The legal battle for making the classified cache of 2,100 abuse photos public has been led by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) since 2004. The watchdog initiated the case after it was denied the release of photos under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
 
Hellerstein ruled in 2005 that the government had to make the pictures public. The ruling was supported by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 2008.
 
However, a bill passed by the US Congress in 2009 made it possible for the Department of Defense to conceal images it deemed dangerous for Americans. That same year, President Obama denied the release of the photographs on the grounds they would “further inflame anti-American opinion & … put our troops in greater danger.”
 
The bulk concealment of abuse pictures is something judge Hellerstein believes wrong. That’s why he ruled in August 2014 that individual reasons should be given for the non-disclosure of each of the photos.
 
I could give you more time to satisfy my ruling...but I am not changing my view,” Hellerstein told the government on Wednesday, as cited by Newsweek.
 
Some are harmless” he said of the pictures, while describing others as “highly prejudicial.”
 
Hellerstein also offered looking through the images with the government, as a way of complying with the court ruling.