Showing posts with label Dubai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dubai. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

City in the sky: world's biggest hotel to open in Mecca

I think if Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) come back to life now & go to Mecca, he wouldn't be able to recognize his own city, & more than likely, he would cry on what the keepers of the Two Holy Mosques have done to such a sacred city. I'm not even going to discuss how he would feel at the status of Muslims around the world.

As the article states, Mecca has become the "Las Vegas for pilgrims." In the article, some one else calls Mecca, the "Mecca-hattan." Really? Will this make Muslims happy that one of the two sacred cities for them is being compared with the "Sin City" & Manhattan?

No, it's not the fault of the writer to compare Mecca with Vegas. I's the fault & greed of the Saudi Royalty who have built so much secular / worldly grandiose monstrosity around the "House of Allah" that it is definitely a miracle that one can even see that sacred House from the air (even that, if you are hovering directly above it).

On top of that, as the article points out, that with these monstrous & very expensive developments, akin to Dubai, Abu Dhabi, & Doha, the poor residents & pilgrims are slowly being priced out of the city. It's like a gradual gentrification where rich elites are trying to get rid of the poor from Mecca by making the real estate in it so expensive that poor people can't visit or live in the city. Just like the poor people in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, & Doha live far outside of the city center, since they can't afford the luxurious lifestyle of the people (who are usually European & North American expatriates) who actually live in the city center.

Ironically, the lifestyle of the Prophet, whom the Saudi Royalty, Saudis, & the whole Muslim world purport to love & follow his ways, was, essentially, of a modern-day poor man. He could count his assets on his fingers. But his followers, in this day & age, apparently count their blessings & show off that wealth by staying at 5-star hotels, like InterContinentals & Hiltons during their pilgrimages.

I am blaming those Muslims (non-Saudis & commoners) because those Muslims are creating demands for these kinds of monstrosities. I mean how can these Muslims feel the hardships & learn from the pilgrimage when they stay in these 5-star hotels with all the luxuries, & perhaps, more luxuries than their own homes. That's why, several Muslims proudly boast that they have performed pilgrimages multiple times, even though, the cost of each pilgrimage is becoming astronomical. Because, pilgrimage for these Muslims is like a walk in the park.

Yes, I agree that in Wahhabism or in true Islam, old sacred sites should be torn down because they do give rise to idolatory. Heck, even now, when Muslims visit Medina, some Muslims start praying to Prophet like, Allah forbid, he is their god. So, destroying non-religious sites is one way to not encourage idolatory but building Paris Hilton stores & Starbucks in their places is also very wrong.

Just imagine, if this same Royalty would've spent this wealth in helping Muslim refugees in Iraq, Syria, Burma, then those Muslims wouldn't have to find shelters in non-Muslim European & South-East Asian countries. Heck, if all those rich Muslim pilgrims who stay in these ultra-pricey hotels during their pilgrimage spend that money on helping their poor brothers & sisters in Islam, they would earn more rewards than showing up in Mecca to show off their social status by booking hotel rooms in these monstrosity of hotels.

If you are still thinking that all these gaudy construction is all well & good, then ask yourself these questions:

1. How many big multibillion $$$ hotels have been, or are being constructed, around the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem? (Judaism holy site for pilgrimage)
2. How many big multibillion $$$ hotels have been, or are being constructed, around the churches in Christianity's Holy Land? (Christianity's holy sites for pilgrimage in Jerusalem)
3. How many sacred pilgrimage sites of Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism are being overshadowed by monster hotels right beside them? (a quick Google search will help you know the answer).

So, why do Muslims, whose Prophet preached to let go of the world & its wealth, are the ones to not only build such buildings & desecrate their holy sites by physically making them so small & miniscule (generally, us, people don't like small things in this world), but also enthusiastically create demand, by shelling out thousands of their money, for someone to build such things?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



4 helipads will cluster around one of the largest domes in the world, like sideplates awaiting the unveiling of a momentous main course, which will be jacked up 45 storeys into the sky above the deserts of Mecca. It is the crowning feature of the holy city’s crowning glory, the superlative summit of what will be the world’s largest hotel when it opens in 2017.

With 10,000 bedrooms & 70 restaurants, plus 5 floors for the sole use of the Saudi royal family, the £2.3bn Abraj Kudai is an entire city of five-star luxury, catering to the increasingly high expectations of well-heeled pilgrims from the Gulf.

Modelled on a “traditional desert fortress”, seemingly filtered through the eyes of a Disneyland imagineer with classical pretensions, the steroidal scheme comprises 12 towers teetering on top of a 10-storey podium, which houses a bus station, shopping mall, food courts, conference centre & a lavishly appointed ballroom.

Located in the Manafia district, just over a mile south of the Grand Mosque, the complex is funded by the Saudi Ministry of Finance & designed by the Dar Al-Handasah group, a 7,000-strong global construction conglomerate that turns its hand to everything from designing cities in Kazakhstan to airports in Dubai. For the Abraj Kudai, it has followed the wedding-cake pastiche style of the city’s recent hotel boom: cornice is piled upon cornice, with fluted pink pilasters framing blue-mirrored windows, some arched with a vaguely Ottoman air. The towers seem to be packed so closely together that guests will be able to enjoy views into each other’s rooms.

“The city is turning into Mecca-hattan,” says Irfan Al-Alawi, director of the UK-based Islamic Heritage Research Foundation, which campaigns to try to save what little heritage is left in Saudi Arabia’s holy cities. “Everything has been swept away to make way for the incessant march of luxury hotels, which are destroying the sanctity of the place & pricing normal pilgrims out.”

The Grand Mosque is now loomed over by the second tallest building in the world, the Abraj al-Bait clocktower, home to thousands more luxury hotel rooms, where rates can reach £4,000 a night for suites with the best views of the Kaaba – the black cube at the centre of the mosque around which Muslims must walk. The hotel rises 600m (2,000ft) into the air, projecting a dazzling green laser-show by night, on a site where an Ottoman fortress once stood – razed for development, along with the hill on which it sat.

The list of heritage crimes goes on, driven by state-endorsed Wahhabism, the hardline interpretation of Islam that perceives historical sites as encouraging sinful idolatry ... . In Mecca & Medina, meanwhile, anything that relates to the prophet could be in the bulldozer’s sights. The house of Khadijah, his first wife, was crushed to make way for public lavatories; the house of his companion Abu Bakr is now the site of a Hilton hotel; his grandson’s house was flattened by the king’s palace. Moments from these sites now stands a Paris Hilton store & a gender-segregated Starbucks.

“These are the last days of Mecca,” says Alawi. “The pilgrimage is supposed to be a spartan, simple rite of passage, but it has turned into an experience closer to Las Vegas, which most pilgrims simply can’t afford.”

The city receives around 2 million pilgrims for the annual Hajj, but during the rest of the year more than 20 million visit the city, which has become a popular place for weddings & conferences, bringing in annual tourism revenue of around £6bn. The skyline bristles with cranes, summoning thickets of hotel towers to accommodate the influx. Along the western edge of the city the Jabal Omar development now rises, a sprawling complex that will eventually accommodate 100,000 people in 26 luxury hotels – sitting on another gargantuan plinth of 4,000 shops & 500 restaurants, along with its own six-storey prayer hall.

The Grand Mosque, meanwhile, is undergoing a £40bn expansion to double the capacity of its prayer halls – from 3 million worshippers currently to nearly 7 million by 2040. Planned like a vast triangular slice of cake, the extension goes so far back that most worshippers won’t even be able to see the Kaaba.

“It is just like an airport terminal,” says Alawi. “People have been finding they’re praying in the wrong direction because they simply don’t know which way the mosque is any more. It has made a farce of the whole place.”

Friday, July 10, 2015

Robert Fisk in Abu Dhabi: The acceptable face of the Emirates

My questions after reading this opinion piece from Robert Fisk are:

1. How Oriental & Western paintings, & Gauguin, Picasso, & Poussin art is going to help educate the Arabs?

2. What's the point of this education when it doesn't help broaden the mind to discuss political, social, cultural, & religious matters openly (instead of one family dictatorship rule)?

3. What's the point of all this educational institutions when Arabs, & Muslims, most likely, have forgotten how Prophet Muhammad used to live & they are spending billions on gigantic mosques to show what to whom?

As Mr. Fisk very aptly asks, "what to make of the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque? The truly gigantic carpet, the chandeliers, the fact that it was constructed by men & materials from Morocco to China & can hold more than 40,000 faithful – all give it the feel of cathedrals built in the Middle Ages. It has avoided the gruesome, concrete pseudo-modernism of the Saudi-built mosques of Bosnia, but is it art? Or, with its gold and precious stones, is it a message about the power of wealth as well as the power of God? The Prophet Mohamed was a businessman & he would, I suspect, have rather liked Abu Dhabi – but Mohamed was also a humble man. Is this mosque humble?"

And while UAE spends billions on grand mosques & building Louvres & Guggenheims "for educational purposes," thousands upon thousands of Muslims are getting killed in South East Asia (Rohingya) to Iraq to Libya, & millions more are refugees. I am not even going to discuss the plights of Muslims in Palestine, Kashmir, Chechnya, & Xinjiang etc.

4. What's the point of this education when those same Arab elites are forcing thousands of foreign workers from South & Central Asia to work in extreme heat of the Middle East, to build these grand mosques, museums, roads, buildings, & essentially, whole cities in the middle of desert, for meagre wages & at great risks to their lives?

5. What's the point of such education which doesn't help one learn the meaning of justice, equality, & basic humanity?

I guess, I can't really pin that one on Emiratis or Arabs only, since this is all over the world. There are far more "educated" people now in this so-called "modern" world than, say, 1900s, but the suffering & plight of our fellow human beings have increased that much in only a century.

Didn't this modern "education" increase injustice, inequality, & erased the meaning of humanity from the public's minds?

So what's the point of such education when it only increases suffering, further traps the public in the flawed system (poor can't get good quality education because of its unaffordability & the rich don't really need it in the first place) & the overall system doesn't change at all since education doesn't help in broadening the mind?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Abu Dhabi Louvre looks like the top of a giant, primordial eggshell pushing its way out of the sand. Its giant dome already glisters under the sun, its construction workers moving like spiders over 5 layers of cladding, steel & aluminium which will give this extraordinary museum a combined weight of 7,000 tons, just a little less than the Eiffel Tower. Already the concrete base of a man-made lake spreads around the construction, for architect Jean Nouvel's Louvre will be on a miniature island, its works of art transported to its gallery through an underground tunnel, light sprinkled into its interior as if through the fronds of palm trees.
 
Very romantic. Very French orientalist, I say to myself. Very Arab too, perhaps. The idea is that art will move chronologically through centuries inside the new Louvre, oriental & Western paintings next to each other.
 
But won't Abu Dhabi have a few problems with nudes, with Gauguin or Picasso or Poussin? No, says my companion, as he explains the double insulation & the cladding which will ... prevent water spewing on to the Louvre's greatest masterpieces. "All that is accepted. This is art. This is for education." Contemporary art will be inside the Abu Dhabi Guggenheim a few hundred yards away, still just a sand-pile of dumper trucks & bobbing labourers' hats.
 
... so many people in Abu Dhabi don't like their names being revealed – my companion included – for they live under a form of autocracy; not the dictatorship of Saddamite or Mubarakite or Ghaddafite political power, but the dictatorship of money. Abu Dhabi is so rich, & its ambitions so mystical, that people speak in whispers. If the Abu Dhabi Louvre has already purchased Gauguin's Breton Boys Wrestling ... & Magritte's The Subjugated Reader ... then perhaps some miracle has taken place.
 
But if all this is educational, what to make of the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque? The truly gigantic carpet, the chandeliers, the fact that it was constructed by men & materials from Morocco to China & can hold more than 40,000 faithful – all give it the feel of cathedrals built in the Middle Ages. It has avoided the gruesome, concrete pseudo-modernism of the Saudi-built mosques of Bosnia, but is it art? Or, with its gold & precious stones, is it a message about the power of wealth as well as the power of God? The Prophet Mohamed was a businessman & he would, I suspect, have rather liked Abu Dhabi – but Mohamed was also a humble man. Is this mosque humble?
 
That's the catch in Abu Dhabi. When you own 9% of the world's oil & close to 5% of the planet's natural gas, you have to decide whether you shout about it, display it before all with Saudi abandon, or send it off to fund charitable projects or cult-like Islamist militias. Abu Dhabi has stuck to charity, avoided the darkness of Wahabism, ... but can't shake off the need for ostentation. And the Emirates Palace Hotel is an obscenity. I've stayed there twice ... & I've written of its imperial architecture – Mogul-Gothic Lutyens, I suppose, with just a hint of Saddam & just a dangerous flavour of Titanic.
 
This is egregious affluence on an unprecedented scale, real gold on the walls, doors & fittings, 1,022 crystal chandeliers & a guest list of Hollywood-Bollywood glamerati who've taken rooms at up to £10,000 a night. So gargantuan is the wretched hotel's size that no guest can escape walking 2 miles a day; the Egyptian & Russian staff call it the "Hotel Sporto" because most have to walk between 10 & 15 miles a day escorting guests.
 
This, however, is being picky. Old Sheikh Zayed, the founder of Abu Dhabi, his son & successor, the current Sheikh Khalifa, & now his brother, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, have all said that the Emirates lagged behind in that most precious, & largely absent, commodity of any Arab state: education. Now that Abu Dhabi had "a lot of wealth" ... the emirate needed to invest in education, Prince Mohammed told a summit 2 months ago. "Maybe in 50 years, we might have the last barrel of oil. The question is: will we be sad? If today we are investing in the right sectors, we will celebrate at that moment."
 
Abu Dhabi is the sensible, adult version of Dubai, the capital of the United Arab Emirates, smaller than its neighbour, but probably the wealthiest city in the world. It's still ruled by the al-Nahyan family whose Bani Yas tribe migrated to the north Arabian peninsula Gulf coast, opposite what is now Iran, in the late 18th century. So rich is Abu Dhabi, with an oil producing capacity of 2.3 million barrels a day, that even its total investments – statistics it prefers to keep secret – must be calculated to the nearest £70bn. The total figure is probably close to £650bn.
 
In the awful corporate language that crown princes now feel constrained to speak, Prince Mohammed said that, while Abu Dhabi possessed oil & gas for the present, "We need as of today to stress that learning outcomes should create human capital that is able to serve us for the 50 years & beyond." In other words, education, education, education…

What on earth, I asked Zaki Nusseibeh, one of the advisers to the government's cultural affairs ministry, was Prince Mohammed banging on about? "The Arab peoples in their revolutions asked for dignity," he replied. "They asked for a future. But… you need to create the 'custom' for discussion & for accepting other people's point of view. All that is happening with religious ideology in this part of the world is a fascist movement. Teaching is by rote – I mean this, by rote – & people are not encouraged to have critical thinking. They don't listen to music at a young age or know what it's like to go to a museum. Sheikh Zayed said this as early as 1968."
 
Mr Nusseibeh sits on a Rhodes Scholarship committee & says how rewarding it is to see two young UAE students competing with international students, to see them go to Oxford to get their Masters. So Abu Dhabi & the other emirates must have good universities, he says, fine schools, a commitment to "education & culture". Investing in the future, every Abu Dhabi government official will tell you, is also about renewable energy, solar energy, but it's primarily about education.
 
"Political ideology has taken over from education," Mr Nusseibeh says of recent Arab history. He talks of the museums & the Biennale in Sharjah & Abu Dhabi & then blurts out one of those clichés which always make me suspicious: that Abu Dhabi must be "a role model for the societies around us – look at the media, the internet city, the communications infrastructure…"

It's not long ago that the West told the Arabs that Turkey should be their role model – until Recep Tayyip Erdogan started going bonkers, talking about plots & locking up journalists & turning into a role model for the Mubaraks & Ghaddafis that had already passed into history. Yet it's not difficult to see what Abu Dhabi is trying to do. If Saudi Arabia is the empire of prayer & Qatar the empire of television ... then Abu Dhabi runs the empire of higher education, the one commodity which has always failed the Arabs, or which the Arabs have always failed to take advantage of.
 
From education comes dignity & from dignity comes justice. But this is surely too sentimental. It's glorious to know that in Abu Dhabi there is an Abu Dhabi Choral Group, an Abu Dhabi Music & Arts Foundation, an Amadeus Music Institute, a House of Oud, studying the Arabic stringed instrument which is a distant relative of the lute, the International Music Institute & the Modern Art Music Institute. But then I find Abu Dhabi's version of Time Out lists 108 bars & nightclubs in its entertainment inventory. Is it trying to imitate Dubai? Can there be two Dubais – or two Abu Dhabis – in the Emirates?
 
And who are they ultimately for? Not for the 4 million foreign labourers, of course. Nor for the middle-class elites who arrive from the West & from the rest of that amorphous "Arab world". An Iraqi high-up in the medical profession in Abu Dhabi – which is why he, too, asked to remain anonymous – explained his relationship with the Emirate in surprisingly frank terms. "We all came here by choice," he said over the hottest coffee I've ever tasted in Arabia. "I made an informed decision – I believed I would have a better life here. I'm very happy with the way they run their country."
 
He paused here, I think because – as a doctor as well as an expatriate – he didn't want to give Abu Dhabi too clean a bill of health. "The deal is this: 'We're going to pay you money & you can have the lifestyle you have chosen – but you have no rights.' A non-Emirati cannot go to a government school. You can only go to a government hospital in emergency. I'm here as a servant of the country. I know if I don't want to be a servant any more, I can get on a plane & go home."
 
Then he thought for a moment & captured the venality of it all. "We're all here by invitation – or temptation."

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Tenancingo: Small town at the dark heart of Mexico's sex-slave trade

As I have blogged before that human trafficking, & especially women being trafficked, for the sole purpose of sex slavery is very common around the world; be it from Nepal to India, or South Asia to Dubai, or East Europe to West Europe, or in Latin America, but the sad part is that it has not only increased in the past decades or so, it is not even reported in the news as vigorously as what ISIS is apparently doing with captured Yazidi girls.

I am not saying that what ISIS is doing is correct, but we need to put this human trafficking & sex slavery phenomenon into perspective. What ISIS is doing is definitely abhorrent & should be stopped, but young girls are becoming sex slaves in Western Europe, Dubai, India, & even North America ... countries / regions, which purport to protect women & their rights.

The scope of what ISIS or Boko Haram is doing is rather small compared to how many girls are being forced into prostitution in law-abiding countries/regions. What's happening to girls in Iraq, Syria, or Nigeria is wrong but considering those are warzones, why is this such a prominent practice (sex slavery) in non-warzones, like Dubai, India, US, Canada, UK, Germany etc.?

Halfway through the article below (around paragraph 11), what strikes me as a universal trait of criminal nowadays is that criminals are the community leaders now, who host & fund religious & community gatherings. They all seem so genuine to the public. It's same all over the world. Now, it's becoming in our society, all over the world, that the younger generation wants to emulate the criminals of their communities. What will happen to that society when role models of the younger generations are the people who themselves are devoid of any morals & ethics?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



María Méndez was a live-in domestic worker when she met Ricardo López on her way to the supermarket. She was 15, from a poor family in the state of Mexico, & had been cleaning houses since the age of 8. He was a cocky, charming 16-year-old from Tenancingo, a small town in the neighbouring state of Tlaxcala. He courted her, promising marriage & a home. She desperately wanted it to be true, & within a fortnight moved with him to Tenancingo.
 
At first López & his family treated her well, but it quickly turned violent. “He sent me to work as a prostitute in Tijuana, Guadalajara, Torreón, Aguascalientes – all over the country to make money selling my body,” Méndez, now 59, told the Observer. “He said the money was to buy land so we could build a little house, but it was all false, even the name he’d given me was false. He made me live a very sad, ugly, desperate life. I was so ashamed.”

Méndez, like thousands of other vulnerable women in Mexico, was hoodwinked by a family of traffickers in Tlaxcala, the country’s smallest state just 2 hours east of Mexico City. This is a deeply religious place, where the indigenous Nahua people united with the Spanish to conquer the mighty Aztecs, but which over the past 5 decades has transformed into an unlikely hub of human trafficking.
 
In the US, five of the 10 “most wanted” sex traffickers are from Tenancingo, where Mendez’s nightmare began. Trafficking networks rooted in Tlaxcala are the biggest source of sex slaves in the US, the state department has said.
 
This improbable crime story began in the 1950s after industrialisation, when working-age men returned home from neighbouring states to find few opportunities beyond badly paid factory jobs. Pimping & trafficking, which they had seen while working away, was a way to get ahead, & many set up small, family-run sexual exploitation rings.
 
Some of the most powerful Tlaxcala families are believed to collaborate with Mexico’s most feared cartels.
 
In 2008 trafficking was detected in 23 of Tlaxcala’s 60 municipalities. By last year this had increased to 35, according to research conducted by local human rights group the Fray Julián Garcés centre, which has identified six “red zones” where sexual exploitation is most concentrated. (A government official told the Observer there were no red zones in Tlaxcala).
 
In Tenancingo, population 11,000, the presence of organised crime is breathtaking. Huge, tawdry houses are scattered among rows of ordinary, modest homes. Everyone knows who own the big houses, though, despite pressure from NGOs to improve transparency & target trafficking proceeds, there is no public land registry. The mansions look like fancy multilayered wedding cakes adorned with sculptured eagles, lions & swans. The grandiosity continues into the cemetery, where tombs are ornate & extravagant – not unlike those seen in villages of the northern state of Sinaloa, from where many of the drug cartel leaders hail.
 
In Tenancingo’s main square, a striking colonial church towers over taco stalls & shoe-shiners, a typical lunchtime scene apart from the new white Mustang & Chevrolet parked beside a bar. Here, a group of men in their 30s & 40s sporting designer jeans & T-shirts knock back cold beers under the piercing afternoon sun. Two police officers are stationed less than 150 metres away.

“These guys are the archetypal padrotes [pimps],” said Emilio Muñoz, a Tlaxcala native & director of human rights & gender violence at the Fray Julián Garcés centre.

“They are the ones who go to other states looking for vulnerable girls to trick – that’s their role in the family business. Everyone knows who the padrotes are, it’s no secret, & it’s the same families who sponsor religious festivals & community events. They operate with almost complete impunity. Trafficking has become so normalised & rewarding that young people look up to them.”

One in 5 children here wants to be a pimp when they grow up, according to a 2010 University of Tlaxcala study. Two-thirds of youngsters surveyed knew of at least one relative or friend working as a pimp or trafficker.
 
Tenancingo is the most notorious hotspot in Tlaxcala, with some estimates suggesting one in 10 people are actively involved in trafficking. But 16km north in Axotla del Monte, population 2,000, the concentration of garish mansions & flashy sports cars is even more conspicuous. This is another red zone, home to loyal, close-knit communities. In December 2012 the army was drafted in after police officers were almost lynched trying to detain an alleged trafficking family.
 
The old interstate highway connecting Axotla with Tenancingo is lined with cheap hotels. Official notices indicate a few recent closures, but many more are under construction. Around midday, young women wearing fake leather trousers & platform heels emerge near the hotels to attract the attention of passing motorists.
 
It is a wretched scene. The women’s features suggest they come from the poor southern states of Chiapas, Oaxaca & Guerrero, where a large proportion of trafficking victims originate, according to the United Nations Office for Drugs & Crime (UNODC). For most, Tlaxcala is only a pit stop until they are sent to more lucrative locations in northern Mexico & the US.
 
In recent years the modus operandi for trafficking throughout Mexico has shifted from kidnap & brute violence towards psychological deception & fake relationships. Poor, uneducated & often indigenous girls & women are dazzled & lured with the promise of jobs or marriage. Most commonly, as in Méndez’s case, women are initially persuaded to prostitute “for love”, in order to help resolve a financial crisis which the trafficking family feigns. By the time they realise & accept they are victims, their “husbands” use beatings & threats against their parents & children – often fathered by the traffickers – to control them.

“The few successful prosecutions have mainly involved international crime groups, yet most trafficking in Mexico occurs within close family & friends’ circles using rustic methods of seduction which are very difficult to investigate & prosecute,” Felipe de la Torre, UNODC adviser in Mexico, said.
 
US authorities have prosecuted several powerful Tlaxcala families, most famously the Carreto clan, who between 1991 & 2004 duped, coerced & trafficked Mexican women into prostitution in New York City.
 
It took almost 10 years for one victim, a woman from Guadalajara, to be reunited with her daughter who was left growing up within the Carreto family in Tenancingo.

“There is a lack of political will & legal sensitivity when it comes to reuniting victims with their children – who are at huge risk of being trafficked or absorbed into the crime family,” said Gretchen Kuhner, director of the Institute for Women in Migration.
 
The Tlaxcala government told the Observer that it has jailed 14 people for trafficking-related crimes since 2011 – around 10% of the national total. Authorities have rescued 127 trafficking victims, closed down more than 200 bars, nightclubs & hotels, & conducted hundreds of awareness-raising events, it added.
 
There are an estimated 20,000 trafficking victims in Mexico every year, according to the International Organisation for Migration. Tlaxcala has no refuge for trafficking victims.
 
Méndez endured 10 years of arrests, humiliation & threats, before finding strength through her faith to stand up to López & stop prostituting herself. “He beat me, threatened to take our children, but I stayed with him because of the shame. I couldn’t bear to tell my family the awful things I had done, or who my husband really was.”

They are still married, & live together near where the girls are forced to prostitute themselves on the highway. López works in a shop, though his extended family continue trafficking. Méndez added: “These men in their nice cars think money is more important than human dignity, but they are monsters, just like my husband. Sometimes when I see the poor girls I can’t breathe. I pray one day this town can come out of this.”

Sunday, April 19, 2015

How to make sex unsexy: Teach it

Well, the author, Emma Teitel, does make some good points that kids, regardless of how much their parents try to protect them or teach them the dangers of sex at home, they will get their sex-ed through their peers (& of course, internet), which will be far more dangerous, wrong, & unhelpful. Teaching it in class in a sterile environment can make it unattractive.
 
And enrolling kids in a Catholic or Islamic school won't help either, since those kids will still live among & socialize with kids who are watching porn, mainstream movies (even movies are quite sexually explicit now), sharing sexual pics, & using chatting apps to chat up with other gender & maybe even child predators etc.
 
There's no sex-ed in seemingly religiously conservative countries like Pakistan or UAE (Dubai & Abu Dhabi), but teens there know a lot about sex related stuff. Heck, making a boyfriend & girlfriend is not allowed, but does it stop anyone from enjoying the pleasures of forbidden love? After all, all those abandoned infants in garbage dumps & hospitals, & abortions (both legal & illegal), are not all legitimate kids but the consequences of a culture which is out of sync with the realities of the world around it.
 
Sweeping the problem under the carpet will only exacerbates the problem since it becomes more pleasurable because humans, & especially teens, have a tendency to do what they are not supposed to do. Something hidden & forbidden is much more pleasurable than the same thing out in the open.
 
Disclaimer: I am not entirely supportive of the new sex-ed curriculum because of only 1 point ... teaching my future kid that homosexuality is alright. Islam strictly forbids homosexuality & that's the only sticking point for me. Hence, it's Islamic school for my future kid. I, myself, don't care what people do in their bedrooms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
... the province’s revamped sex-ed curriculum ... includes other topics equally significant to the modern age: sexting, cyberbullying and LGBT issues ... .

 
The new curriculum, revised in 2010 but shelved by then-premier Dalton McGuinty after a small group of socially conservative parents complained, will be introduced to the province’s schools in September—but not without controversy.
 
Chief among the things that disturb this group is the early age at which students will learn the facts of life. Kids in Grade 2 will learn about consent, kids in Grade 3 will learn about homosexuality & same-sex marriage (which is to say they will learn that such things exist ... ). Students in Grade 7 will get the facts on contraception, STDs, & oral & anal sex. Being products of a hypersexual era, they will likely know these things already (& a whole lot more), whether their parents want them to or not; some kids watch porn for the first time when they are 10.
 
But parents wary about sex ed in Ontario—or parents wary of progressive sex education anywhere in the country—shouldn’t despair at the thought of teachers taking health class into the future. They should rejoice. In fact, they have more reason to rejoice than their socially liberal counterparts, for there is no dissuading voice more powerful when it comes to sex than the voice of an enthusiastic, open-minded authority figure. Kids don’t giggle in health class because they are titillated, but because they are embarrassed. Talking to a teacher about sex, watching him circle the urethra on a giant diagram of a penis, or put a condom on a banana, does not typically make a kid hot & bothered; it makes her cringe.
 
Students will not find out about sexting from their friends—or from those sexting them—but from their teachers. In other words, when Susie receives her first explicit text message, she may not be able to shake the memory of Mr. Johnson’s lesson in sex ed about the “the dangers of dick pics.”

This doesn’t mean that cybersex will never be had again, or that kids will stop downloading porn, but that an intensely private world will, for the first time, be made public in a very sterile, cerebral & unsexy place. In the end, then, progressive sex ed may not just be a victory for public health, but for abstinence.