Showing posts with label racial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racial. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Black teachers still face racism on the job in Ontario

I used to be surprised when people used to get surprised at the news that there's racism in Canada; the country which thinks it is better than US in regards to such form of discrimination & hatred.

But I don't get surprised at them, because I already know those people, who are the majority of the population, are living under a rock, when it comes to their social knowledge. They may know a lot about their profession, politics, sports etc., but when it comes to know what's going on in their vicinity which is affecting adversely to their fellow human beings, they are completely clueless.

I know there's racism in Canada because I suffer it myself. I know there's racism in Canada because I hear from other people in my community who suffer from it. But most people in our supposedly "diverse" society live in so insularly that they are completely oblivious to these daily facts of life.

Recent riots & violence in US in regards to racism didn't come out of nowhere, but they were the result of years & decades of racism by the American "white" majority. Since, African-Americans are that many more in population in US than any other race, racism affects them with that much force.

In Canada, the adverse effects of racism are few but intense. Reason being that a large majority of some 35 million of Canadians are of one race, & other races make a small portion of the whole population. On top of that, many stories of racism never surface, so we never come to hear the full extent of racism in our society.

As interim president of ONABSE says in the article below that "racism is still deeply ingrained in society."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Many black teachers across Ontario still face racism on the job, according to a new study of educators, half of whom said they believe being black has hurt their chance of promotion. Some told of hearing the ‘N’ word used in the staff room & being mistaken for a trespasser.

“I had a supply teacher tell me I am not allowed to park my car in staff parking,” said one of the 148 black educators across 12 Ontario school boards surveyed for a report ... . “The ‘N’ word was used in casual conversation in our staff room,” said another. “I was introduced as ‘home girl’ to a student teacher.”

The 63-page report, The Voices of Ontario Black Educators, prepared for the Ontario Alliance of Black School Educators (ONABSE), calls for Ontario to enact tough employment equity legislation, provide training against anti-black bias, set targets for promoting teachers of colour & cluster black teachers in particular in schools where there are high numbers of black students.

“We’re disappointed, but not surprised at the findings — racism is still deeply ingrained in society,” said Warren Salmon, interim president of ONABSE, which commissioned the report because of concerns expressed by its members.

Of the black teachers, principals & vice-principals surveyed, one-third said they believe they have been passed over for advancement because they are black. Some 27% said racial discrimination by colleagues affects their day-to-day work life & 51% said they believe anti-black bias at their school board affects who gets promoted.

Equity consultant Tana Turner of Turner Consultants conducted the survey, & called for school boards to “set equity goals & timetables — not just have an employment equity office which merely measures the numbers of employees …"

Toronto vice-principal Darlene Jones said she has not experienced racism either as a teacher or as vice-principal of Beverley Heights Middle School — “not at all; but I’m not alarmed that it exists. It’s our world; you just have to hope that by changing mindsets, things will change.”
...


The report included numerous anecdotes of “micro-aggressions … the everyday slights, insults & indignities” that imply black teachers don’t belong:

• One was “asked by a principal if I would ever consider straightening my hair.”

• Another was “told I should steer away from too much black history in the class as black history is not important when no black students are present.”

• On arriving at a new job assignment, “colleagues asked if I am a new caretaker.”

• “A colleague was shocked that I was raised by both parents — & expressed it in the staff room.”

Turner noted that in 2011, 26% of Ontarians were “racialized” (visible minorities) — a figure that soars to 72% in Markham, 66% in Brampton, 54% in Mississauga & 49% in Toronto. However, she said the percentage of teachers of colour lags behind the population.

Some 31% of the Toronto District School Board’s staff self-identified as visible minorities in 2012. At the University of Toronto’s faculty of education, 46% of current students self-identified as being part of a visible minority.

The ONABSE report calls for more rigorous tracking of the diversity of teachers in Ontario schools.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Racially diverse emojis miss the point

One of the problems of current society; trying to minimize & tackle the sensitive issues of discrimination (racial, gender, sexual, religious etc.) by not investing enough time & resources to thoroughly understand the problem & then find its appropriate solutions. Trivializing or even deflecting a serious problem will not make it go away (as some may believe) but make the issue that much bigger when it's keep simmering below the surface when it is not handled in a proper way.
 
Trying to handle such critical issues as racial or gender discrimination through emojis or Barbie dolls isn't solving the problem but making it even worse. What does Apple is trying to say to the world through these colourful emojis ... that they are racially neutral? What Apple should have been doing was making its hiring practices more neutral & removing discrimination from it. An African-American/Canadian Barbie doll or an emoji is not going to suddenly get the people talking about race relations in North America or help change North American businesses' eliminate or reduce discrimination; that is just trivializing a serious problem.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And there is a lot to say about the normalization of our media, about the belief that whiteness is our baseline, even as Caucasians become a racial minority in countries around the world. It is, no doubt, a problem; look no further than the marginalization of African-Americans from the Academy Awards, or the quiet neutering of Asian actors & actresses. A New York Times feature just this weekend helped to expose the insidious bias against black people in photography: “In our time, as in previous generations, cameras & the mechanical tools of photography have rarely made it easy to photograph black skin,” wrote Teju Cole. “Beginning in the mid-1940s, the smaller film-developing units manufactured by Kodak came with Shirley cards, so-named after the white model who was featured on them & whose whiteness was marked on the cards as ‘normal.’ ” Across a wide swath of pop culture, the idea that white is the standard has become ingrained.

 
The problem is, the idea and execution of racially representative emojis completely misses the point.
 
For starters, emojis never really had a race problem. The invention of Shigetaka Kurita, emoji have an Asian root that has in many ways been whitewashed over, with many of the original ones depicting Japanese-centric images such as a bowing businessman ...
 
So the standard baseline in emojis was never really white—that’s a later interpretation that society has applied.
 
And the reality of racial representation is that it will, invariably, leave someone out and leave someone unhappy. It has already begun; social media has noted there is no one with freckles & red hair among the six new colour options for each emoji. The backlash has started, too, as some have been furious over the bright yellow of what they are seeing as the “East Asian” skin colour—ironic, since they’re actually referring to the aforementioned “cartoon-like” emoji complexion, as Asians are not technically depicted at all, given the fact the new emojis reportedly hew to the Fitzpatrick scale, a “dermatological standard” for judging race. (The Fitzpatrick scale did not adequately measure non-white skin colour for years after its 1975 creation, dumping all non-white skin into one category.)
 
That doesn’t even cover the fact that racial representation in emojis squelches the very thing that makes emojis tick, which is their loose, ambiguous interpretative quality. ... the fun of emojis are that they mean nothing, & therefore, can mean anything.
 
And while it’s hardly wrong to get our hackles up over race, it seems odd that the hill we are choosing to defend is the one where the baseline was an intentionally preposterous complexion for a fun thing whose use is derived by its ambiguity.