Monday, August 31, 2015

3,000 children enslaved in Britain after being trafficked from Vietnam

After I keep hearing news of how adults & youths, of both genders, were keep getting enslaved in war torn countries, where there is no law & order, I came upon this article & thought to put some perspective to this news of slavery ... in a developed Western country. Now, this article is highlighting the problem of slavery in UK, but US & Australia have a similar problem.

These 3,000 children are enslaved in UK. They are being sexually & physically abused & put in domestic labour as a slave. The authorities, as usual, keep saying that they are trying to end it but losing the war against slavery. The reality of 21st century is that the slavery has actually increased in this century.

Slavery is wrong, regardless of whoever or wherever it happens. But, considering, there are almost 10,000 to 13,000 slaves in Britain, then how can the Western developed countries expect people in war torn countries to prosecute people in slave trade (criminal gangs & organizations) & protect people from being enslaved. It's very easy to blame others for their practices & ideologies before judging oneself where he/she is standing.

Furthermore, we need to keep in mind that these criminal gangs are only suppliers of slaves. Supply cannot exist without demand. That means then that people in the West, regardless of their race, education, national origins, ethnicity, religion, are open to knowingly taking in a slave, as long as it benefits them, somehow. Slavery exists because the general public demands it. Now, it might be a small section of the general public who is demanding it, but they definitely are the customers. The public supports slavery by either directly buying the slaves (usually rich elites) or indirectly asking for quality products at the lowest prices possible, which is possible only by businesses paying no or extremely low wages (recall my blog on Thailand's fishing, & Australian & Spanish agricultural industries employing slaves).

Since, we also know that criminal gangs would not be involved into this business without making a good return on their investments, they charge high prices for these slaves. So, their customers must be well-heeled to be paying such high prices for these slaves, which, in turn, means that they themselves are earning handsomely. So, the "respected" rich elites of our society don't hesitate from slavery. Hey, I thought, that happened in 1800s in the Western countries. So, after all, it seems like that the society hasn't developed, at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hien was 10 when he arrived in Britain. He did not know where he was or where he had been. He knew only that he was here to work. Since he emerged from the back of a lorry after crossing from Calais 7 years ago, his experience has been one of exploitation & misery. He has been a domestic slave, been trafficked into cannabis factories, been abused & beaten & was eventually prosecuted & sent to prison. It has been a life of terror, isolation & pain.

... . He is one of an estimated 3,000 Vietnamese children in forced labour in the UK, used for financial gain by criminal gangs running cannabis factories, nail bars, garment factories, brothels & private homes. Charged up to £25,000 for their passage to the UK, these children collectively owe their traffickers almost £75m.

While there is growing awareness of the use of trafficked Vietnamese people in the booming domestic cannabis trade, child trafficking experts are now warning that the British authorities are unable to keep up with the speed at which UK-based Vietnamese gangs are recruiting & exploiting children for use in other criminal enterprises such as gun-smuggling, crystal meth production & prostitution rings.

By our calculations there are around 3,000 Vietnamese children in the UK who are being used for profit by criminal gangs,” says Philip Ishola, former head of the UK’s Counter Human Trafficking Bureau.

The police & the authorities are now aware that trafficked children are being forced to work in cannabis farms but this is really only the tip of the iceberg. Often the same child will be exploited not just in a cannabis farm but also in myriad different ways. This is happening right under our noses & not enough is being done to stop it.”

Police admit that they are struggling with the speed at which Vietnamese criminal gangs are diversifying & expanding their activities across the England & into Scotland & Northern Ireland. “Right now we are just fighting in the trenches, fighting in the nail bars,” said detective inspector Steven Cartwright, who heads Police Scotland’s human trafficking unit. “It is vital that we that we understand new methods being deployed by the gangs because we need to stop demand at one end or limit their ability to make money at the other.”

Hien’s journey to the UK started when he was taken from his village at the age of 5 by someone who claimed to be his uncle. As an orphan, he had no option but to do as he was told. He spent 5 years travelling overland, completely unaware which countries he was going through, from Vietnam before being smuggled across the Channel & taken to a house in London. Here he spent the next 3 years trapped in domestic servitude, cooking & cleaning for groups of Vietnamese people who would come in & out of the property where he was held.

The men in the house beat him & forced him to drink alcohol until he was sick. Other things happened to him that he still cannot talk about. He was never allowed out of the house & was told that if he tried to escape, the police would arrest him & take him to prison.

During his time in that house, Hien says, many other Vietnamese children were brought in. They told him that they were here to work & to pay off debts for their families back home. They would stay for a few days & then be taken away, & Hien never saw them again. He became homeless after his “uncle” abandoned him. He slept in parks & ate out of bins. He was eventually picked up by a Vietnamese couple, who offered him a place to stay but then forced him to work in cannabis farms in flats in first Manchester & then Scotland.

In his testimony to police, he says he still does not understand exactly what the plants were, although he understands now that they are worth a lot of money. He looked after the plants, using pesticides that made him ill, & only left the flat when he helped transport the leaves to be dried elsewhere. He was locked in, threatened, beaten & completely isolated from the outside world.

I was never paid any money for working there,” he says. “I did not stay there for money but because I was afraid & I hoped the whole thing would end soon.”

When the police came, they found Hien alone with the plants. He told his story to the police, but was still sent to young offenders’ institution in Scotland, where he spent 10 months on remand, charged with cannabis cultivation. He was released only after the intervention of a crown prosecutor led to him being identified as a victim of trafficking.

Vietnamese children such as Hien are easy pickings for the increasingly sophisticated trafficking gangs operating between the UK & Vietnam. Children make up nearly a quarter of the estimated 13,000 people trafficked into the UK every year, & Vietnamese children are the largest group of children trafficked to the UK. The United Nations Office on Drugs & Crime estimates that 30 Vietnamese children arrive illegally in the UK every month, on well-established smuggling routes.

Children are an increasingly valuable assets to criminal gangs because they are easy to get hold of, easily intimidated & exploited, & easy to keep isolated & unaware of what is really happening around them, which makes it far less likely for them to be able to disclose anything of use to the police,” says Ishola.

When it comes to Vietnamese children, he says, the culture of seeing a child as the “golden egg”, who will be sent to work abroad & provide for their families still prevails. This attitude is exploited by gangs, who deceive families into believing that there is legitimate work in Britain for their children.

During their journey to the UK, the traffickers keep charging the children more & more money, & by the time they arrive, the pressure to pay back this enormous debt is a key factor in their vulnerability to ending up trapped in forced labour,” he says. “Upon arrival the children are faced with a highly organised system of criminal activity, with methods of control ranging from extreme physical brutality to debt bondage. Before they even arrive, that trap is set for them.”

Members of the Vietnamese diaspora in London told the Observer that they had seen an explosion in child trafficking by criminal gangs operating on the peripheries of their communities in recent years. “Some of these children & victims have told me that it cost them £25,000 to get to the UK,” said one Vietnamese community leader in London, who did not want to be named. “They come with a debt & they are not allowed to leave until the debt is paid. That is slavery & exploitation.”

Like Hien, many of the children end up working on cannabis farms. The link between child trafficking & the UK’s domestic cannabis industry has been increasing, with Vietnamese children the main group at risk. According to a 2014 report by the NGO AntiSlavery International, almost all potential victims of trafficking linked to cannabis are Vietnamese, & more than 80% are children.

Many of these children are subsequently prosecuted by the UK justice system, despite many being identified as potential victims of trafficking. This has led to Vietnamese children becoming the second-largest ethnic group held in youth detention centres across the UK.

Vietnamese gangs have historically dominated the UK’s £1bn cannabis trade & have been instrumental in the proportion of domestically grown cannabis in Britain rising from 15% in 2005 to about 90% now. While the trade remains enormously profitable – the number of Vietnamese cannabis factories in the UK has grown by 150% in the past 2 years – their grip has been weakened thanks to increased law enforcement & under competition from British growers. Now they are finding new & more efficient ways of doing business.

In terms of law enforcement, I think we’re about 2 years behind the curve,” says Daniel Silverstone, a criminologist at London Metropolitan University who has written extensively on Vietnamese gangs in the UK.

Traffickers have changed their modus operandi in recent years in direct response to the attention & interventions of law enforcement. A few years ago it was almost exclusively cannabis farms, but their business interests have now become much more diverse. So we’re seeing an expansion into Scotland & Northern Ireland, the use of nail bars for forced labour & money laundering, & moves into drugs like crystal meth.” This means that children, who are an integral part of the gangs’ business operations, are also now being moved into other areas of exploitation. “As their grip on the domestic cannabis trade slips a little, they are looking to maximise their profits from these children in whatever way they can,” he adds.

The Metropolitan police say that there is now much more awareness of the complexity of tackling the UK’s child trafficking problem but that the closed nature of the Vietnamese community has made things difficult. “What has persistently been a challenge for us is making inroads into this community,” says Phil Brewer, who heads its new human trafficking & kidnap unit. “We usually only find out about a child when we make a raid & find someone in a cannabis factory or nail bar, but often this person has been through multiple forms of exploitation before we reach them.”

Parosha Chandran, a leading human rights barrister & UN expert on trafficking, has represented Vietnamese children charged with cannabis cultivation who have gone through many different trafficking situations before being moved into cannabis farms.

Trafficked Vietnamese children have rarely faced just one type of forced labour,” she says. “I’ve come across cases where young people have been subjected to a spectrum of exploitative practices. In one of my cases, for example, the child was forced to look after people’s homes & care for their children, when he was just a child himself, then he was taken to work cleaning a nail bar, then moved to another place where he was forced to sew labels on to clothing – & all of this happened before he even arrived in the cannabis factory.”

In March the UK passed its first Modern Slavery Bill, designed to increase the prosecution of traffickers & give better protection to victims of modern slavery in the UK. However, Chandran says that Vietnamese children continue to be prosecuted for cannabis cultivation while their traffickers remain free.

The Modern Slavery Act’s central focus on prosecution is misguided & its provisions fail to fully protect the rights of trafficked children,” she says. “We as a democratic country need to find durable solutions to ensure these children remain protected from harm for the rest of their lives.”

...

Methods used to lure children from Vietnam to the UK are also becoming increasingly sophisticated, including use of social media. “Vietnamese children are brought to the UK, taken in by Vietnamese adults & put to domestic work,” says Swat Pandi, from the NSPCC’s child trafficking advice centre. “The child feels indebted to the adults for food & shelter & is told they need to return the favour by looking after cannabis plants. These children suffer high levels of neglect, emotional abuse &, in the absence of any protective factors, are highly vulnerable to physical & sexual abuse.”

Despite the government’s pledge to end modern slavery & the UK’s first modern slavery bill, passed in March, Chitty says she has seen no change in the numbers of Vietnamese children coming through her charity’s services. “It’s very much business as usual,” she says. “We still have a problem with immediate safeguarding & appropriate placements for trafficked children. And young people are still being criminalised by the courts.”

Even when a child has been taken out of trafficking & come under the care of a local authority, he or she is likely to return to the control of the traffickers. In 2013, a report by independent thinktank the Centre for Social Justice concluded that 60% of trafficked children in local authority care go missing, nearly a third of them within a week of arrival. Most are never found again. There are increasing reports of children being retrafficked from foster homes or when they have been given asylum status.

I don’t think we understand the entire enterprise,” says detective inspector Cartwright. “Despite our best intentions I think we’re not offering them anything that would persuade them to stay. Many will get retrafficked because we didn’t offer them a better alternative to what the traffickers are providing.”

Hien is trying to rebuild his life after being given asylum in Scotland, but is struggling to find peace after years of trauma. “I still worry that the traffickers may find me & come to my house. But I know this time that I will ask for help,” he says. “I think they have justice here but I wish they hadn’t kept me in prison for so long. By telling my story, I want people to understand what I have experienced here.”

Three years of confronting Western propaganda

wow ... a great piece ... on Western (North American & European) imperialism & pro-Western propaganda on spreading lies about the regions of the world it doesn't like. The writer's books might be amazing, too.

Although, I haven't yet visited many of the places he mentioned in the opinion piece, I definitely agree with the parts that most residents of the West are completely ignorant & live in their own little bubble.

People around the world think Western countries became such developed countries because of their hard work & discipline. Heck no !!! They weren't even developed nations until the second world war. Sustainable development takes decades upon decades, sometimes, even centuries. Islamic empires in Middle East, Spain, North Africa, & South Asia were around from 700 AD to 1920s. That's almost 1200 years of Islamic rule on a big chunk of the world. On the other hand, if you may recall, the whole European continent was destroyed to ground during the second world war. Before then, several prominent business & political elites, in the West, became rich on the back-breaking slave labour of thousands & thousands of African-American slaves. Heck, even now, "slaves" are "employed" in the form of minimum wages, which is unsustainable for people to live on, in every industry, from agriculture to hospitality to restaurant to manufacturing. British, French, & Spanish soldiers looted whichever countries they invaded or controlled, from Africa to Asia.

What people forget to see is that how America & its allies in NATO, UN, G8 etc. started to play political games around the world, after 1945, to keep the developing world in constant chaos; for example:

a. foreign wars & invasions on lies, for example, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Vietnam, Korea (one country divided up & still at war).

b. supporting civil wars & dictators, for example, US supporting dictators of Middle Eastern countries (even Saddam Hussein was a friend of US at one time) & dictators of South American countries (Nicaragua, Chile, Panama etc.).

c. pushing weapons in developing countries like a drug dealer pushes drugs on people, for example, from South America to Africa to Middle East, countries are encouraged to buy more & more weapons to fight anyone, domestically & internationally, to the point that the leaders of those developing countries start seeing every problem as a nail to be solved by a hammer (weapons).

Whichever countries didn't / don't go along with the West, those countries were / still are politically & economically blocked (Venezuela, Cuba, Iran) & Western media go into hyperdrive spreading lies about those countries, all over the world.

If you think developing countries are inhabited by savages, please ask yourself:

1. How many countries did Brazil invade to develop itself?
2. How many countries did China invade or waged war upon to develop itself?
3. How many countries did Iran or Cuba or Venezuela or Zimbabwe or South Africa or even Libya (during the reign of Gaddafi) invade, or waged war, or caused civil wars in other countries?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


After my two days marathon discussion with Noam Chomsky, (at MIT in 2012), a bestselling book was born. Later this year a film will hit the cinemas.

Noam & I discussed Western imperialism, & the terror it has been spreading around the world. After WWII, at least 50 million lives were lost. Lives of those whom Orwell used to call “unpeople”; lives brutally interrupted as a result of Western-led & orchestrated wars, invasions, coups & proxy-conflicts.

We discussed at length the Western propaganda, which, for centuries, worked extremely hard to justify everything from the colonialist insanity, to supremacist & exceptionalist theories.

After my encounter with Chomsky, I decided to dedicate at least 2 years of my life to visiting most parts of the world, where the Empire had been striking; where it was attempting to bulldoze all opposition that was standing on its way to the absolute control over the planet.

My goal was Quixotic - a monster, 1000-page book, exposing & confronting techniques & dogmas utilized by the Empire in all corners of the globe, for purposes of destabilizing “rebellious” nations, overthrowing “unruly” governments, or simply grabbing natural resources.

As a philosopher & investigative journalist, I was aiming at both defining how the Western dogmas & propaganda work, & at giving concrete examples of the horror into which our planet was once again descending.

In the past, I have lived & worked on all continents, from Oceania to South America, North America, Africa, Europe, Asia & the Middle East. Throughout the years, I became convinced that the natural development of the human race was interrupted, derailed & forced into dark alleys by extremely selfish, perverse group of people & the states, which I call The Empire.

The Empire is “fundamentalist”; it believes, religiously, in its cultural & racial superiority. It is convinced that dominating the world is its sacred right. To achieve its goal, it is using imperialism, colonialism & savage neoliberalism. It is willing to sacrifice millions, tens of millions of human lives to achieve its goals.

I witnessed its crimes on all continents. And I finally realized that it is my duty to define its actions & deceits.

Soon I decided on the title of my book: “Exposing Lies of The Empire”.

It is clear that the Empire lies & that it uses some of its best brains to spread fabrications, as well as billions of dollars in cold cash. It is because the arrangement of the world is grotesque & thoroughly absurd. And only propaganda, shaped to perfection, can guarantee that status quo is maintained. Propaganda & submissiveness of a brainwashed population (in the West), which accepted such propaganda in exchange for at least relatively privileged position in the world.

I talked to Westerners in Paris, London & New York, & I was stunned how little “freedom” there really is, how intellectually cowardly the citizens of the Empire are. In hundreds of art galleries of Paris, I encountered almost no political art, nothing that would make people dream of a better world. In Europe, the level of knowledge about the ‘surrounding world’ (that very same world which basically feeds the continent) was close to zero. Very little was known about the crimes that the Empire is committing.

Europeans are self-promoters, defining themselves as educated & refined, but well over 99% of those I challenged could not name even one Korean writer, or Japanese painter, of Chinese classical musicians. Any elementary school kid in Beijing or Tokyo can produce dozens of names of Western cultural icons from the top of their head.

China is different. It is obsessed with knowledge! I spent days in Beijing & Shanghai theatres, opera houses & galleries. I spoke at Tsinghua University (they ran a 2-day seminar on my work) in order to understand Chinese students better. I drove some 5,000 kilometers all around China. I always knew that the Western media has been openly & shamelessly spreading lies about the PRC, trying to shout loudly & continuously, that China is not a socialist country, anymore. In fact, anybody who knows it well can testify that it is socialist & its tremendous success derives from this very fact.

I visited North Korea, as it was celebrating its 60th anniversary of victory. I spent time talking to North Korean citizens, from farmers & workers, to artists, even to the Vice President. I was enormously impressed – by the housing, public transportation, culture. People were cool. My interpreter was devouring mountains of potato chips, picking my brain about South American music, while asking me for advice on how to deal with her cautious boyfriend. It was all very “normal”. I saw more propaganda all over South Korea, than in the North. Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun interviewed me on the subject, but no Western mainstream publication would run such a story.

I was writing my book as I went: each country smeared by the Empire & “rehabilitated” by me – one chapter. A story about some outrageous lie – another chapter...

Zimbabwe – I read in the Economist & on the BBC site that crime there is endemic, that there are no functioning operation theatres in Harare’s hospitals, that Harare is “the worst city on earth”. I went. All lies. There were dozens of operation theatres in several hospitals. After Nairobi where I was then living, & after Kampala & Kigali where I was often working - three darlings of Western imperialism, as Uganda, Rwanda and Kenya have been plundering & ravishing the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan & Somalia on behalf of Washington, Paris & London - Harare felt safe, beautiful, cultural; the capital of the country with the highest literacy rate in Africa. While in Nairobi, more than half of the people live in appalling slums & misery, I found only about one square kilometer of slums in Harare.

South Africa, struggling to shake off its terrible legacy of apartheid, is another target of negative Western propaganda. It is because the country is, despite many hindrances, still marching forward, inspired by the left-wing ideology.

Parallel to writing my book, I was filming several documentary films for TeleSur & PressTV, to keep afloat. I went all “around Syria”, where NATO trained & financed “Syrian opposition”, including ISIS, in the refugee camps of Jordan & Turkey. I travelled to Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. The West destabilized, ravished one of the greatest countries of the Middle East, as it ravished the entire region.

I worked in Bahrain & Iraq where, at some point I stood on the bridge blown up by ISIS, looking at two villages bombed to the ground by the US, the city of Mosul only 6 kilometers away. All actors of this bloody, nightmarish drama were actually related or produced by the Empire’s “foreign policy”, or were part of the Empire themselves.

Lies of the Empire are piling on top of each other. “India, the largest democracy”! Anyone who knows this country, even my luminous Indian friends like writer Arundhati Roy (author of The God of Small Things) & documentary film-maker Sanjay Kak, feel unwell hearing this cliché. India is free only for the elites. It is built on the “ideals” of British colonialism. I call it “securistan”.

In my book, I am showing examples how the Empire tries to destroy Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, Eritrea, China, South Africa, & Iran – through outrageous propaganda & through manufacturing of the “opposition movements”. Last year I spent 2 weeks in Hong Kong trying to understand how the brains of local students work, how they were indoctrinated, & made to fall for the Western dogmas, how they are made to antagonize China. The parallel with the strategy that the Empire is using in order to destabilize & smear Cuba, Venezuela & Russia was striking.

I drove all around Ukraine, realizing how close most of the people there felt towards Russia. I talked to workers at the city of Krivoi Rog, to grandmas in the countryside, to students in Kharkov & Odessa: the West created the conflict in Ukraine & pushed it to complete absurdity, dividing 2 great nations with virtually the same culture.

I also studied environmental destruction in Oceania & Indonesia. In Micronesia, entire nations may have to be soon evacuated because of the global warming. I wrote entire book on the topic, several years ago, but “Exposing Lies of the Empire” is also touching this shocking subject. All over the Oceania, the Empire created “culture of dependence”, & destroyed enormous old & fascinating civilization.

“Exposing Lies of The Empire” is now in print, but I do not feel that the journey is over. 822 pages ... is actually very little, comparing to thousands of horrendous stories that the Empire is triggering all over the world.

There is no time to take a break. Pseudo-reality & outright lies of the Western imperialism have to be confronted.

My work on the second volume of “Exposing Lies of The Empire” has already began. The book will keep expanding. It is “the process”, which will never end, as long as the imperialism reigns.


Andre Vltchek is a novelist, filmmaker & investigative journalist. He has covered wars & conflicts in dozens of countries. His discussion with Noam Chomsky "On Western Terrorism" is now going to print. His critically acclaimed political novel "Point of No Return" is now re-edited & available. "Oceania" is his book on Western imperialism in the South Pacific. His provocative book about post-Suharto Indonesia & the market-fundamentalist model is called “Indonesia – The Archipelago of Fear”. He has just completed the feature documentary, “Rwanda Gambit” about Rwandan history & the plunder of DR Congo. After living for many years in Latin America & Oceania, Vltchek presently resides & works in East Asia & Africa. He can be reached through his website or his Twitter.

Sunday, August 30, 2015

Criminal Minds, S1E11 quote


Value your relationships with your loved ones before they depart from this world.

Pentagon slammed for building $36 Million 'white elephant' facility in Afghanistan

So, while the residents of the developing world thinks that corruption is non-existent in developed world, the bastion of democracy & honest government in the developed world (US) keeps showing to the world that how much it is a corrupt country.

US unilaterally invades countries & wages wars for one reason only; military & defence industries need more money. Wars in Afghanistan & Iraq, financially helped high-ranking military officials, defence contractors, large businesses involved in defence & military (Raytheon, Lockheed Martin etc.), & of course, all those politicians who not only receive huge sums of money from defence lobbyists, but they also may have personal financial interests with those companies.

Who loses out in these wars? Common foot soldiers who lose their lives, & if not dead, then suffer horrific physical & mental injuries, & of course, the common citizen; the taxpayer.

Common foot soldiers have always been considered expendable by the rich elites, who use them to achieve their own objective; horde more wealth. Romans use to invade neighbouring villages & force the men of those villages to join the Roman army. British & American did the same thing during multiple invasions around the world & Civil War etc., where Indians or African-Americans were forced to fight in wars.

Now, American military uses more sophisticated approach, but the real result is the same. Education is so expensive that poor students think that a few tours of war zones is worth the risk of a free education & boarding. Those poor kids are usually have a non-American background, for example, Latinos or South Asians. They enlist in the army, get trained, go to a foreign country, commit heinous crimes, die or suffer horrific injuries, & come back to America (dead or alive). If alive, American government leaves them alone, to fend for themselves on their own, & all the while, rich elites got their oil & gas contracts (like Halliburton's contracts in Iraq), construction contracts (to build useless facilities like the one profiled in this article), & military & defence contracts to build more weapons or to provide more security to government officials.

The rich business & political elites also don't pay or pay minimal taxes, anyway. Since, they always find some loopholes to get out of paying the government their fair share of being a citizen, somebody else has to pick up the tab. Come the common & poor citizen; the single mother who works multiple shifts to earn enough to support her young family, the hardworking & poor student who works & studies in the hopes of earning a degree one day & making his/her future a bright one, the young couple who tries to earn enough by working multiple shift jobs & seldom seeing each other, just so they can provide all they can to their little family.

Government very regularly, & with strict punctuality, takes taxes from these poor souls, all in the name of providing social benefits to them. But, social benefits are continuously being cut. Those poor citizens don't benefit from those taxes. Those taxes are used as subsidies to large, international businesses to extract more fossil fuels from the ground, to build more weapons for useless wars, & to pay continuously increasing salary packets of career politicians.

Imagine how much American citizens would have benefited from these $36 Millions of their own taxes being used on them as social benefits; how many homeless would've gotten social housing, how many poor kids would've gotten healthy meals with government subsidies, how many poor families would've been able to buy healthy, organic foods for themselves with government subsidies to lower the costs of organic foods, how many poor students would've gotten some help in reducing their education loan (if not completely eliminating those loans) etc.

After all this, the world still thinks American government thinks of its people, first, & then someone else. The world still thinks American government is honest, fair, & free of corruption. The world still thinks America is a land of equality & justice. What America has definitely accomplished is that the world thinks of only great things about America. As someone wise once said that "the Devil's greatest accomplishment was convincing the world that he didn't exist."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



John Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR), issued a report ... on the construction of the 64,000-square-foot command-&-control facility at Camp Leatherneck in Helmand Province, Afghanistan in 2010. The need to build the facility was justified under plans by President Barack Obama’s administration to increase the number of US troops in Afghanistan.

The building was completed in April 2013, despite requests from some senior Pentagon officials to halt construction. According to the investigators, who visited the site, the facility was “well built” & equipped with new furniture.

However, by that time the US had already begun to withdraw its troops – so there was no need for it. "Ultimately, construction of the building was not completed until long after the surge was over, & the building was never used," the report said.

The building was never occupied & on Oct. 29, 2014, Camp Leatherneck, including the … building, was closed by the US & transferred to the Afghan government,” the Washington Times quoted the report as saying. “In the end, $36 million in US taxpayer funds was spent on a building the US never used.”

The Afghan Army, which has taken over security duties from US-led forces, is not currently using the building. There were various proposals for the facility, including transforming it into a movie theater & fitness club.

Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri, the top-ranking Democrat on the US Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, who first inquired about the case, said: “This is one of the most outrageous, deliberate, & wasteful misuses of taxpayer dollars in Afghanistan we’ve ever seen.”

Sopko, the special inspector general, published a letter calling for an inquiry into the case in July 2013. The Department of Defense conducted two investigations, accusing those responsible for the project of corruption, as the facility allegedly cost $25 million, instead of $36 million. But nothing followed the inquiry.

When it was clear this building wouldn’t be used, & when 3 commanders requested its cancellation, the Army not only built it anyway but completely failed to hold any officials accountable after all the facts came to light — so I’ll now be fully expecting answers from the Army,” McCaskill said, McClatchy DC reported.

SIGAR recommends holding to account 3 US officers: General-Lieutenant Peter M. Vangjel “in light of his decision to construct…building over the objections of commanders in the field, resulting in the waste of $36 million,” Army Major General James Richardson because of his “failure to carry out a fulsome investigation” & Army Colonel Norman F. Allen for his attempt to "discourage full cooperation" with the report.

Wars in Iraq & Afghanistan have witnessed many cases of misuse of money by the military. For instance, a police base in an Afghan village built, which cost $500,000 from the US military budget, fell apart 4 months after completion because of faulty construction.

The US has the largest military budget in the world – in 2016 it plans to spend more than $600 billion, & some experts believe that even this figure is underestimated.

US & Israel inequality champions of developed world - OECD

So, the wealth gap keeps increasing, or in other words, it keeps getting worse ... not in North Korea or China or one of those Middle Eastern monarchies, but in the world's biggest champion of free market & capitalism; US.

In US, the richest 10% of the population earn 16.5 times as much as the poorest 10%. On top of that, the top 5% of American households own almost 91 times the wealth of the average American household.

OECD report cites the reasons for this rising wealth gap to education levels of rich & poor, rise of non-standard work (temporary & self-employment work), & faulty tax systems & erosion of social benefits. Let's examine each of them.

Difference in education is going to increase the wealth gap. But what the OECD didn't look into is that education, in itself, has become so expensive that obtaining an under-graduate degree now requires a fortune, esp. from a good, respected university. Rich kids are supported by their fathers' wealth while they are getting that education, but a poor kid cannot lean on his parents (assuming he/she has one or both) for tuition. Rich kids graduate with no debt to be repaid, but masses of poor kids graduate with mountains of education debt or student loan.

On top of that, education in itself is not going to land one in the higher echelons of corporate America, where they will be paid 6-figure salaries & numerous chances of upward mobility in the corporate hierarchy. Nowadays, it's the age of networking. Of course, rich kids will have that powerful network to lean on, whereas, poor kids are outside of that powerful social circle. So, even when, kids of both social classes have equal education, they are still unequal due to debt levels & network.

That leads to the next point that the rise of non-standard work is due to rising hordes of poor students graduating with degrees but without any network. So, they may still get a job in a company but at the lowest level of corporate hierarchy. If & when the company plans to cut down its costs, the lower rungs of the corporate ladder are cut loose first. Since, those people need the money & have few options, if any, other than keep working with whatever companies are offering them, they accept temporary work & self-employment. Wealthy people have financial & influential networks to pull them into the upper echelons of the corporate world & hence, their jobs never get slashed.

Tax systems are made by legislators, who, in turn, are controlled & influenced by rich people of the country. Since, the rich didn't become rich by handing out their money, they will never willingly ask any legislator to increase taxes on them. So the tax systems will never change for the better. They may become worse, though, for the poor.

Social benefits are usually tied to permanent jobs & higher taxes. Since, permanent jobs are being cut, in favour of temporary work, & taxes will never be raised to help the poor populace, social benefits are only going to be reduced.

So, the question is; will this wealth gap ever reduce? My resounding answer is: NO, IT WILL NOT. Why?

Because, education is only going to get expensive. Good, secure, high-paying, permanent jobs will only go to people with influential networks. Tax systems will only become worse for the poor (& better for the rich), since when politicians have ever tried to upset the hand which feed them (rich business elites). Social benefits are only to be eroded to the point where bare minimums will still be available, but the vast majority of poor won't qualify for most social benefits.

Then, there will be revolutions on the streets, similar to Occupy Wall Street protests, except they will be bloodier & far more violent than the preview the world got back in 2008. Remember the French Revolution. OECD developed countries are going back into that era of a club of rich elites controlling almost all wealth of the nation & their citizenry. History is going to repeat itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In most countries, the gap between rich & poor is at its highest level since 30 years. Today, in OECD countries, the richest 10% of the population earn 9.6 times the income of the poorest 10%,” said the Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD) in a report ... . “In the 1980s this ratio stood at 7:1 rising to 8:1 in the 1990s & 9:1 in the 2000s.”

Compare the average 9.6 index with the US, where the richest 10% of the population earn 16.5 times as much as the poorest 10%. The poorest citizens of Israel scrape by on one-fifteenth of the earnings of the richest 10%.

The US also has the widest gap between the income of the richest & the average households. The top 5% of US households own practically 91 times the wealth of the average.

The OECD report, covering the situation in 18 member nations, says half of total wealth resides in the hands of just 10% of population, while the next 50% hold almost all of the second half, leaving the remaining 40% with the scraps - just over 3% of the wealth.

The record level of inequality is explained partly by a wider gap in education between the richest & poorest social groups, leading to lower quality & productivity in the workforce.

Another factor that OECD considers responsible for growing inequality is the growth in what it calls non-standard work, which includes temporary contracts & self-employment.

Since the mid-’90s more than half of all new jobs created in OECD countries fell into this category, according to the report. Families that rely on this type of employment are much more likely to be poor, exacerbating overall inequality.

OECD experts warn that the rising level of inequality is hampering world economic growth.

High & often growing inequality raises major economic concerns, not just for the low earners themselves, but for the wider health & sustainability of our economies,” the report says. “Put simply: rising inequality is bad for long-term growth.”

The report also cites increasingly less progressive tax systems & social benefits losing ground to inflation as reasons why income redistribution schemes have become less effective as of late. Instead, the study advocates a more direct system of taxation & transfer.

Redistribution via taxes & transfers is a powerful instrument to contribute to more equality & more growth,” the report says.

It also mentions the increasing number of working women as one of the factors contributing to the growth in inequality. Women earn 15% less than men, according to the report, which says ensuring equal pay for men & women could be one way to reduce the wealth gap.

Latin America is one of the few regions where inequality hasn’t been growing in the last 30 years, despite the social gap there being initially higher, the OECD said.

Thursday, August 27, 2015

"Where Apple makes its money" by Martyn Turner

"Where Apple makes its money" - Martyn Turner, The Irish Times, Dublin, Ireland

Living paycheque to paycheque a reality for thousands in Toronto

This is the ugly reality of Canada. 1.5 Million Torontonians earning almost $38,000 a year, which puts the family under the social class of "poor". And that's when several of these people earning this wage are university educated from a Canadian university. People in other countries think that residents of Canada must be rolling in cash.

Since, when I became unemployed, people are constantly telling me that this is the new reality & just take any job which is paying even $30K. What those completely ignoramuses don't realize that once you get in that tier of temporary & contract work force, earning $30K-$40K without any benefits, you are forever stuck in that tier. Life would be a little hard, not to say the least, even for myself; forget saving anything for kids' futures. That's when I have an MBA from a reputable university & 7 years of work experience.

Besides, what readers may not focus on the fact that the guy in this article is a native resident of Canada (read: white guy). The question arises then that what about all those legal immigrants & "people of colour" who may not even have "relevant work experiences" or Canadian education? They are in even worse positions (of course, depending upon which area of work we are talking about, e.g. computer-related work is still good enough).

People from developing countries think that since, Canada is a developed country, there will be lots of money to be made there. Bearing that false misconception, they move their whole family to Canada, & that's when they realize what an ignoramus they have been up until that time.

Now, such economic & financial problems might be considered temporary problems, & usually, the hope is that eventually, the economy will improve, labour market will improve, & everyone will be happy all around. The problem with that thinking is that what it is ignoring the fact that that economic improvement depends a lot on several factors; for instance, size of country's economy, government's tax policies, domestic consumption, foreign trade treaties, domestic industries (types, sizes, diversification) etc.

Canadian economy is very heavily dependent on only one industry; fossil fuels. And even then, that industry is localized in one geographical area of the country. Then what is the rest of the country should do? Wait for a handout from Alberta & Saskatchewan? Everyone relocate their whole families in those provinces (not an easy thing to do for every family)? Go back to university & shell out another $ 50,000 for another degree in oil & gas?

Canadian government, on the other hand, is more focused on spending taxpayer dollars on Kurds & the war against ISIS in Iraq & Syria, while Canadians are making the rounds to their local food banks to satisfy their hunger for basic food. Manufacturing sector is dwindling & moving to Mexico, thanks to Mexico's foreign trade treaties with several countries around the world. Canadian government can't help the country with favourable tax policies since the country doesn't have that much money (as per the government).

But, no worries, for the rich business & political elites. Their billion, million dollar wealth & 6-figure incomes are completely safe. Why do they care for small time citizens who dutifully paid taxes & now get their food from local food banks. Hey, I thought that only happened in corrupt "developing" countries. (sarcasm)

This is the ugly reality of living in a developed country.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Every time Eric Pinsonneault visits the grocery store, it’s a nail-biter for the single father of 3 kids, all under the age of 10.

He pushes his cart down the aisle, silently hoping to find a sale, or at the very least price tags that haven’t risen too much since his last visit.

Most of the time that doesn’t happen, & so he gets inventive — price matching, only serving the family meat 3 times a week, & cooking dishes that rely on cheaper staples such as rice & pasta.

My income is so low, it makes everything that much harder,” says Pinsonneault, who lives on $38,000 a year, just above minimum wage.

That places him among the 1.5 million Torontonians making less than $21 an hour & in a smaller group earning under $18.52 — the figure recently reported as the necessary hourly wage to meet the needs of 2 parents working full-time while raising 2 children.

These low earners are part of a growing class plagued by skyrocketing housing prices, astronomical child-care rates & a broadening sense of poverty that puts a strain on shelters, food banks & welfare organizations.

Pinsonneault, a 30-year-old who calls himself “poor,” never expected to join that category when he was fresh out of university, comfortably living in a three-bedroom Chatham house that cost him $700 a month.

That was before he had 3 kids, went through a divorce, lost a job in a brutal downsizing & moved to Toronto.

Now, the administrative co-ordinator for a local start-up finds himself watching bills grow, wondering how he will cobble together enough cash to pay them off. Recently, he had to borrow from family to cover his credit card expenses, & just before that, he accepted his children’s school’s offer to pay their agenda fees.

There is always something else,” he says. “I just got hit for a field trip for $20.”

Meanwhile, he says, his kids are getting older, needing more food & feeling pressure from peers to wear name-brand clothing & own all the latest Apple gadgets. The family can’t afford a landline or cable TV, so fancy clothing or an iPad are out of the question, says Pinsonneault. The same goes for trips to the movies or nights out.

To make up for it, Pinsonneault treats the family to breakfast at Sunset Grill once a month. Other times, he will shell out $15 on 3 $5 pizzas, giving the family enough food for lunch & two fun dinners.

“(My kids) understand that it’s only my money & that we are poor,” he says. “I try to give them as much as I can, but it’s hard.”

...

After tucking them into bed one evening, he told the Star, “I’m struggling, but emotionally, as a parent, I am bogged down knowing that they don’t get everything. That’s the hardest part.”

One day, he envisions things could be more manageable — he’ll move up in the fast-growing company he works for &, perhaps, the government will listen to collective pleas for lower child care & housing costs & a higher minimum wage.

But even then, he says, “I never put my hopes up high. It’s one day at a time.”

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Iraq war was a mistake, say today's White House hopefuls

So, after killing thousands upon thousands of Iraqis & leaving their country in a mess, American leadership is essentially saying, "oops, my bad."

When every sane person from Alaska to Australia & Russia to Chile was uttering the same mantra that attacking Iraq is a huge mistake, American leadership not only turned a deaf ear & blind eye to those sane voices, but they forced / incentivize their allies to join them in this non-sense of a war. Did those sane people had any more intelligence about Iraq than American CIA & British MI6 & all those other spying agencies US has around the world?

As I posted a picture & quote from the 2012 movie, Emperor, recently in my blog, in which a friend of Emperor Hirohito of Japan summarizes the past 100 or so years of international land occupation & warfare, to General Fellers (Matthew Fox). He said that Japan took the Singapore & Malaya from British, & Philippines from the Americans, who themselves took it from the Spanish. Britain & Portugal had long ago occupied Chinese territory (Hong Kong & Macao). But nobody ever tried to convict French, Dutch, British, & American leadership for their wartime transgressions, but Japan does the same thing (which was wrong, of course) once (in World War 2), & Americans are looking very intently in trying to punish the Japanese leaders.

Fast forward a few more decades & Iraq invades Kuwait & Russia annexes parts of Ukraine & US & its allies start talking about illegal land grabs & defending the freedoms of Kuwaitis & Ukrainians. But did Americans think about the Iraqi freedoms when they attacked Iraq & killed thousands of innocent civilians & turned that country in a mess, & all based on lies & deceptions?

Even if we forget about Iraqis for a minute, then what about all those American taxpayers who dutifully paid taxes, while living on meagre incomes themselves, & their own government leaders threw away their taxes, amounting to in the billions, in foreign lands, in international wars, from which US gained nothing, except, perhaps, creating more lone-wolf terrorists & terrorist organizations (ISIS)? What about those almost 5,000 American soldiers who died in Iraq fighting a war based on lies & with no positive results?

All those billions of dollars would've reduced education costs for Americans. All those billions of dollars would've reduced / eliminated healthcare costs for Americans. All those billions of dollars would've created millions of jobs for Americans. All those billions of dollars would've helped American businesses in raising minimum wages (while American government would've reduce the burden of mandatory increased wages through subsidies etc.). All those billions of dollars would've made the lifestyle of Americans much better, all the while creating no terrorists in foreign lands.

In America, the common perception is that a victim doesn't get justice until the criminal is punished, in whatever way punishment befits the crime. In American corporate culture, when an employee makes such a huge mistake where billions of $$$ are sunk in a venture & receives no benefit whatsoever out of that venture, he/she is summarily fired from his/her job.

It seems to me that the rules of life for American leaders is quite different than American public. While one gets punished for a small mistake, the other goes scot-free for killing thousands of Iraqis & Americans, throwing away billions of its own citizens' hard-earned money, & helped in creating a much bigger menace in such terrorist organizations as ISIS & lone-wolf terrorists. This is American democracy & freedom hard at work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A dozen years later, American politics has reached a rough consensus about the Iraq War: It was a mistake.

Politicians hoping to be president rarely run ahead of public opinion. So it’s a revealing moment when the major contenders for president in both parties find it best to say that 4,491 Americans & countless Iraqis lost their lives in a war that shouldn’t have been waged.

Many people have been saying that for years, of course. Polls show most of the public have judged the war a failure by now. Over time, more & more Republican politicians have allowed that the absence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq undermined Republican President George W. Bush’s rationale for the 2003 invasion.

It hasn’t been an easy evolution for those such as Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, now favoured to win her party’s nomination, who voted for the war in 2002 while serving in the Senate. That vote, & her refusal to fully disavow it, cost her during her 2008 primary loss to Barack Obama, who wasn’t in the Senate in 2002 but had opposed the war.

In her memoir last year, Clinton wrote that she had voted based on the information available at the time, but “I got it wrong. Plain & simple.”

What might seem a hard truth for a nation to acknowledge has become the safest thing for an American politician to say — even Bush’s brother.

The fact that Jeb Bush, a likely candidate for the Republican nomination in 2016, was pressured ... into rejecting, in hindsight, his brother’s war “is an indication that the received wisdom, that which we work from right now, is that this was a mistake,” said Evan Cornog, a historian & dean of the Hofstra University school of communication.

Or as Rick Santorum, another potential Republican candidate, put it: “Everybody accepts that now.”

Santorum didn’t always see the war that way. He voted for the invasion as a senator & continued to support if for years. ...

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, as a Republican candidate in 2008, said invading Iraq had been “the right decision.” But on his way to winning the 2012 Republican nomination, Romney said the war never would have happened if US & world leaders had realised Iraq didn’t have the weapons of mass destruction.

It’s an easier question for presidential hopefuls who aren’t bound by family ties or their own congressional vote for the war, who have the luxury of judging it in hindsight, knowing full well the terrible price Americans paid & the continuing bloodshed in Iraq today.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio & Texas Sen. Ted Cruz weren’t in Congress in 2002 & so didn’t have to make a real-time decision with imperfect knowledge. Neither was New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie or Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who served an earlier stint in Congress.

All these Republicans said last week that, in hindsight, they would not have invaded Iraq with what’s now known about the faulty intelligence that wrongly indicated Saddam Hussein had stockpiled weapons of mass destruction.

They didn’t go as far, however, as war critics such as Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, a declared Republican candidate, who says it would have been a mistake even if Saddam were hiding such weapons. ...

Former President George W. Bush & his vice-president, Dick Cheney, still maintain that ousting a brutal & unpredictable dictator made the world safer.

In his 2010 memoir, Decision Points, Bush said he got a “sickening feeling” every time he thought about the failure to find weapons of mass destruction & he knew that would “transform public perception of the war.”

But he stands by his decision.

The war remains a painful topic that politicians must approach with some care.

Jeb Bush, explaining his reluctance to clarify his position on the war’s start, said “going back in time and talking about hypotheticals,” the would-haves & the should-haves, does a disservice to the families of soldiers who gave their lives.

When he finished withdrawing US troops in December 2011, Obama predicted a stable, self-reliant Iraqi government would take hold. Instead, turmoil & terrorism overtook Iraq & American leaders & would-be presidents are struggling with what to do next. The US now has 3,040 troops in Iraq as trainers & advisers & to provide security for American personnel & equipment.

For the most part, the public & the military — like the politicians — are focused less on decisions of the past than on the events of today & how to stop the Daesh militants who have overrun a swathe of Iraq & inspired terrorist attacks in the West.

The greater amount of angst in the military is from seeing the manifest positive results of the surge in 2007 & 2008 go to waste by misguided policies in the aftermath,” said retired US Army Col. Peter Monsoor, a top assistant to Gen. David Petraeus in Baghdad during that increase of US troops in Iraq.

Those mistakes were huge & compounded the original error of going into Iraq in the first place,” said Monsoor, now a professor of military history at Ohio State University. “There’s plenty of blame to go around. What we need is not so much blame as to figure out what happened & use that knowledge to make better decisions going forward.”

Emperor movie quote


A great line from 2012 movie, Emperor, neatly summarizes the past 100 years or so, & the current international chaos UK, US, & other European countries have caused in the world. These countries cause an uproar when one country, e.g. Japan in World War 2 or any other country (Iraq "invading" Kuwait in 1991, Saudi Arabia in Yemen, Russia annexing parts of Ukraine etc.) does the exact same thing which they themselves (US, UK, & other European countries) have been doing for the past several decades.

US goes into Iraq & kills thousands upon thousands of innocent civilians & then says, "oops, my bad ... I thought Iraq had WMDs." No criminal prosecution against American leaders. Russia takes parts of Ukrainian territory & North America to European leaders are up in arms.

**Disclaimer: I am not favouring any one country over another or one country's aggression over another. I am saying that international law, if it is being applied, then should be applied equally over everyone.

Canada's support of Israel is dangerous

A great post from Robert Fisk.

This order of "you cannot criticize Israel", which the current government of Canada intends to enact, is nothing short of a dictatorial rule. Where's that freedom of speech & democracy, which Canadian governments, past & present, so much shout about all over the world?

Even if the government doesn't enact this law, it has already expanded the meaning of hate crime in Canada. So any vague reference towards criticism of a Canadian ally will definitely irk the government & the activist(s) can face jail time.

What happened to that peaceful, non-violent way of protesting against something wrong? When Mandela was imprisoned for decades by South African apartheid government, the Western governments were up in arms. Mandela was celebrated around the world for standing up against the South African apartheid regime until it gave in to his demands of granting freedom to South Africa. Western political & business leaders love to quote Gandhi that how he got India free from British colonialists without the use of violence. But nobody in the Western hemisphere says anything when Canadian government comes up with such a dictatorial law to love Israel.

Mr. Fisk ended the piece with a great advice for the Canadian, & in general, Western government leaders, that "boycotting a state for its crimes is a non-violent but potentially powerful way to express moral outrage at a time when political statements ... fail to represent the anger of voters or have any effect on a state that ignores international law. If you take that away, then the Boston bomber, now facing the execution chamber, can say that his was the only way." Criticizing a government is a peaceful way to express outrage. The other option for an activist is violence.

As I always say in my blog posts that democracy in the West, & all over the world, is a smoke-&-mirror game. It doesn't actually exist. Governments are run by career politicians who earn millions & give the ignorant public the illusion of "choosing" their leaders, even though, it has already been decided, long before the first ballot has cast, who will be the reigning king of the kingdom.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I’ve never been keen on boycotts. The one against Italy for invading Abyssinia didn’t work. Nor did the arms blockade on Spain. I’m still not sure that boycotting South Africa really brought down apartheid. I rather suspect that the old racists simply realised they were hopelessly outnumbered by the blacks of South Africa & that the game was up.

And I’m still unconvinced that boycotting Israel, even though it frightens the right-wing crazies in Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, will achieve a two-state solution, human rights for Palestinians, etc. I’m free to refuse to buy products from Jewish colonies in occupied Arab land (I do not buy them), but, when I visit Israel, I stay at the King David Hotel in west Jerusalem, visit the Tel Aviv gallery of art & buy Israeli-published books. Some Israeli academics support a boycott of their own country. They may be right in doing so.

But in Canada – & I had to literally rub my eyes when I read this – the totally pro-Israeli Conservative government of Stephen Harper intends to list the boycotting of Israel as a “hate crime”. This is not only ludicrous, stupid, pointless & racist because it assumes that anyone opposed to Israel’s vicious & iniquitous policies of land-grabbing in the West Bank is an anti-Semite, but it is also anti-democratic. Those who believe in non-violence have always espoused boycott movements on the grounds that economic pressure rather than bombs is a moral way of putting pressure on a country that violates international law.

Yet Harper, who would surely be elected to the Knesset if he were an Israeli, went so far as to suggest on a recent visit to Jerusalem that merely to criticise Israel can be a form of anti-Semitism. The newly retired Canadian Foreign minister John Baird ... has described Canada’s Boycott Israel movement as “the new face of anti-Semitism”. In January, he actually signed an official agreement with Israel to fight the Boycott Israel organisation, known locally as the BDS (Boycott, Divest & Sanction) group. Steven Blaney, who rejoices in the title of Canada’s “Minister of Public Safety”, says that boycotts of Israel cannot be separated from anti-Semitic hate speech & the recent attacks against Jews in France.

This is preposterous. If I decline to buy Israeli-produced oranges at a British supermarket, this doesn’t make me a Nazi murderer. To criticise Israel doesn’t turn Canadians into Jew-haters. A number of liberal Jewish groups have protested against Harper’s proposed extension of existing ‘hate laws’ – far too many Jewish organisations have praised it – on the grounds that it assumes that all Jews support Israel or approve of its actions. And since Jews are also members of boycott-Israel groups, Harper’s expanded definition of the law would have to put Jews on trial in Canada for anti-Semitism.

Cloaked as usual in the kind of Blairite (& Cameronite) clichés that all law-&-order politicians adopt, Canadians are told that their government will show “zero tolerance” towards groups advocating a boycott of Israel. Of course, we show “zero tolerance” on the streets towards theft, mugging & gangland thuggery. But “zero tolerance” against those who wish to boycott a nation whose army slaughtered more than 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza last year, more than half of them civilians? Really? It was significant, I thought, that, after the killing of a Canadian soldier outside the Ottawa parliament by a Muslim last year & a murderous attack on Canadian servicemen, Harper publicised the message of condolence he had received from Netanyahu, as if the commiserations of a man who ordered the bombardment of Gaza were something to be proud of.

The dark little catch in all this is that last year Canada changed its definition of hate speech to include statements made against “national origin”, not just race & religion. Thus statements or speeches critical of Israel – like a number of public lectures I have given in Canada – may now be classed as statements against Jews (even though Jews are often among the organisers of my own speaking engagements in America). And, in due course, editorials in papers such as the Toronto Star can be deemed anti-Semitic & thus worthy of being denounced as a “hate-crime”.

This extended definition of 'hate crime' will put a lot of civil society groups under the cosh. The United Church of Canada & Canadian Quakers could find themselves in court & judges, however much they personally recoiled from Israel’s abuse of Palestinians, would have to abide by this outrageous piece of legislation & exercise “zero tolerance” against the free speech of those who condemn war crimes by Israel in the Middle East.

It is worth remembering that tens of thousands of Jews throughout the world, & especially in America & Poland, called for a boycott of Nazi Germany in 1933 for the very anti-Semitic acts that led directly to the Holocaust. American diplomats were critical, lest it provoked Hitler to even crueller deeds. But they didn’t threaten the protesters with “zero tolerance” of “hate crimes” because of the “national origin” of the Germans they proposed to boycott.

In the end, of course, it’s quite simple. Boycotting a state for its crimes is a non-violent but potentially powerful way to express moral outrage at a time when political statements – or cowardly governments like that of Stephen Harper – fail to represent the anger of voters or have any effect on a state that ignores international law. If you take that away, then the Boston bomber, now facing the execution chamber, can say that his was the only way.